Nursing Education Lesson Plan Evaluation

Assessment Traits
Benchmark
Assessment Description
The effective nurse educator collaborates with partners and the community during the curriculum design process. The purpose of this assignment is to reflect and refine your lesson plan based on collaborative feedback from the preceptor/mentor.
Meet with your preceptor/mentor to review your lesson plan. Discuss your lesson plan and possible barriers to successful implementation. Based on the collaboration with the preceptor, provide a brief summary (200-350 words), to address the following:
1. Prior to meeting with the preceptor, reflect on your lesson plan and identify areas of strength and improvement. Describe opportunities for scholarship that will advance your teaching practices.
2. Describe identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement based on preceptor feedback.
3. Explain changes made to the lesson plan based on your findings in items 1 and 2 (above).
4. Explain the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on your practicum setting) on your lesson plan changes for future implementation.
APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Benchmark Information
This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:
MSN Nursing Education
6.4: Engage in the professional role of the nurse educator through systematic self-reflection, reflective
teaching practice and exploring opportunities for scholarship.
Rubric Criteria
Reflection (B)
5.75 points
Criteria Description
Engage in the professional role of the nurse educator through systematic self-reflection, reflective teaching practice, and exploring opportunities for scholarship. (C6.4)
5. Target
5.75 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices are thorough.
4. Acceptable
5.29 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices are detailed.
3. Approaching
5.06 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices are present.
2. Insufficient
4.6 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices lack details or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Areas of strength and improvement and a description of opportunities for scholarship that will advance the teaching practices are not present.
Strengths and Improvements
6.25 points
Criteria Description
Description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement.
5. Target
6.25 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement is thorough.
4. Acceptable
5.75 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement is detailed.
3. Approaching
5.5 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement is present.
2. Insufficient
5 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement lacks details or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of identified areas of strength and areas that need improvement is not present.
Changes Made to Lesson Plan
6.25 points
Criteria Description
Explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement.
5. Target
6.25 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement is thorough.
4. Acceptable
5.75 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement is detailed.
3. Approaching
5.5 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement is present.
2. Insufficient
5 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement lacks details or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of changes made to the lesson plan based on the discussion of strengths and areas of improvement is not present.
Interprofessional Collaboration
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation
5. Target
5.5 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation is thorough.
4. Acceptable
5.06 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation is detailed.
3. Approaching
4.84 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation is present.
2. Insufficient
4.4 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation lacks details or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of the importance of interprofessional collaboration with involved stakeholders (based on practicum setting) on lesson plan changes for future implementation is not present.
Mechanics of Writing
1.25 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
1.25 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable
1.15 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
3. Approaching
1.1 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient
1 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.
I AM COUNTING ON YOU NOT TO GO OVER THE LIMIT OF 350 WORDS. REMEMBER THIS PROFESSOR TAKES OFF POINTS FOR GOING OVER THE WORD COUNT. I AM ATTACHING MY PRATCUM LESSON ASSIGNMENT FOR YOUR REFERENCE. FOR ANY QUESTIONS DO NOT HESITATE TO CONTACT ME. I HOPE YOU STILL WANTED ANOTHER ASSIGNMENT FROM ME.
THANK YOU EVER SO MUCH FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO DO ASSIGNMENTS FOR ME