Modern Ethics in Nursing Research and the Issues in Using Face Validity
Question 1
How has history defined and shaped modern ethics in nursing research? What are some additional issues or personal examples you can think of that can further our understanding of ethics in research? Explain.
Question 2
What are some issues to consider when using face validity? What are some potential pitfalls to avoid, and how would you avoid them? Give a couple examples.
Question 3
In your opinion, is it possible to perform a truly and totally pure structured interview? For example, how can you negotiate a participant that tends to add more than the question requires? Explain.
Question 4
Discuss the focus of ethnographic analysis. How do you plan to account for such issues as bias, subjectivity, and objectivity in order to provide a quality and ethical ethnographic analysis? Give a few examples.
Question 5
Argue the pros and cons of evidence-based practice (EBP). Why would a focus on EBP be good for the discipline of nursing? How can barriers to the use of EBP be overcome?
Question 6
Visit an Internet resource devoted to evidence-based practice (Cochrane Collaboration, AHRQ’s National Guideline Clearinghouse, or Bandolier Evidence Based Journal). Review a summary systematic review on a topic of interest. Present your findings to your classmates, and illustrate how this may or may not be used in practice.
Short Essays
Student’s Name
Institution
Course Name and Number
Date
Short Essays
Question 1
Ethics in research ensure that nurses and other healthcare professionals practice with integrity and respect for human dignity and life. In biomedical research, research involving human beings has been conducted for years using experimental treatments. Although some of these studies have been a source of scientific breakthroughs, they have also been characterized by the unethical treatment of human beings involved in the studies (Grove & Gray, 2018). Since nurses are involved in biomedical research, history in unethical studies has defined and shaped modern ethics in nursing research. According to Boswell and Cannon (2017), unethical research can be traced back to the 1780s when Edward Jenner experimented on his son using swinepox for inoculation against smallpox and later using cowpox on other human subjects without first establishing whether these treatments were safe for use in human beings.
However, unethical research with a significant influence on ethics in modern nursing research started in the 1930s. According to Grove and Gray (2018), between the 1930s and 1980s, nurses were involved in the implementation of unethical research studies such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, the Nazi Medical Experiments, the Willowbrook Study, and the Jewish Chronic Disease Hospital Study. These studies have shaped modern ethics in research through the development of international codes such as the Nuremberg Code, the Belmont Report in the United States, as well as professional ethics and principles that guide nursing research. As the world continues to change, ethics in nursing research also need to change to ensure integrity in research is maintained. Some additional issues that can further our understanding of ethics in research include enhancing awareness about ethical principles and creating a balance to ensure that there are scientific breakthroughs while still protecting human subjects.
Question 2
Face validity examines whether an instrument or item appears to measure what it claims to measure (Connell et al., 2018). An instrument is considered valid if it appears valid based on its face value. It is a simple approach to measuring the validity of research instruments/items. However, according to Gray and Grove (2021), face validity is a weak measure of validity because it relies on observation and different people, such as the researchers or subjects using an instrument, can have different views. For instance, what one person may consider as psychological distress may vary depending on personal experiences. Face validity only provides subjective judgment and lacks clear guidelines for judging the instrument or item (Gray & Grove, 2021). This makes face validity less reliable and accurate. When using face validity, researchers may avoid using direct statements or questions to enhance the validity of the responses. Gray and Grove (2021) suggest framing the statements or questions in such a way that participants will still perceive the instrument as measuring the construct they were told to provide information about. For instance, if the construct being measured is addiction, using statements such as “I ...
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to ethics essays:
- Nursing Ethics and the Social Determinants of Health for the Future of Nursing Practice1 page/≈275 words | 2 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- The Main Ethical Problem on Research Ethics of Standard Prison Experiment1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Social Sciences | Essay |
- Leadership Management, Role of Ethics, and Developing Leadership Skills5 pages/≈1375 words | 5 Sources | APA | Management | Essay |
- Quiz on Roles of Ethics and Laws Concerning Enron's Fraud Issue10 questions | No Sources | Other | Social Sciences | Multiple Choice Questions |
- eBay's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics Alignment with My Professional Ethics Statement3 pages/≈825 words | 2 Sources | MLA | Management | Essay |
- Preventing Potential Ethics and Compliance Issues during Capstone Project2 pages/≈550 words | 2 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- The ASBH Code of Ethics for Healthcare Professionals3 pages/≈825 words | 4 Sources | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |