Dissertation Development When Compared with Neighboring Counties Essay

Dissertation Development: When Compared with Neighboring Counties, does Charles County Curriculum align with Common Core State Standards?
Name
Institution
Date
Dissertation Development: When Compared to Neighboring Counties, does Charles County Curriculum align with Common Core State Standards?
Annotated Bibliography
Jones, A., & King, J. (2012). The common core state standards: A Vital Tool for Higher Education. Change, 44(6), 37-43. Retrieved November 14, 2020, from  HYPERLINK "/stable/23594938" \t "_blank" /stable/23594938
In this journal, Allison Jones and Jacqueline King note that K-12 learners have been adopting new standards, building new forms of assessment and curricular as compared to in higher education who have been dealing with a myriad of challenges. The K-12 standards are on the verge of redefining success for American schools. In partnership with governors, leaders of K-12 have inducted new initiatives to achieve the one goal: college and career readiness, as indicated through the new common core state standards (CCSS) IN English language arts and Literacy (ELA/literacy) and Mathematics. For years, the goal and basic success measure of several school systems were on graduation.
The Common Core State Standards are benchmarked to the best-performing states in the US and other countries around the world, reflecting the judgment of college and university faculties involved in their development, reviewing their knowledge and skills, which matter most for post-secondary achievements. Colleges and Universities can use CCSS and assessments to improve their objectives for learning, productivity, student success, and even economic development. This article responds to key concerns about the new standards and also describes the ways that higher education can use them to achieve its goals.  
Botzakis, S., Burns, L., & Hall, L. (2014). Literacy Reform and Common Core State Standards: Recycling the Autonomous Model. Language Arts, 91(4), 223-235. Retrieved November 14, 2020, from /stable/24576868
Botzakis, Burns, and Hall indicate that current reforms in the education sector are characterized by the implementation of Common Core State Standards. This formulaic approach to the solving of complex and diverse challenges has been based on a very limited scope of scientific studies. The limitation culminates in inadequate foundations on narrow views of reading, writing, and speaking/listening making it essential for professional teachers to advance past the standards to ensure all students are supported to succeed. However, the authors warn that the CCSS cannot account for everything a student should know in English language arts, the standards move from the primary assumption that the development of literacy and language arts means incorporating a one-size-fits-all form of teaching also referred to as an autonomous literacy model.  
A major downside of using autonomous models that literacy instruction becomes simplistic and more focused on covering the given standard to the detriment of student learning. The CCSS ends up becoming the checklist for academic objectives, hence addressing the issue of learner preparation superficially, geared towards standardize...