Reflection of Articles

Reflection of Articles
Name:
Institution:
Course Title:
Professor:
Date:
DQ 1.1
Jordan
Interestingly, the risks associated with the “curbside consultations” depend on the state within which they are practiced as opposed to the legal requirements and standards related to it. Nonetheless, it is true that depending on the state, such consultations may be considered to act as a resource depending on the intention and area of application. Thus, it creates the question of what factors would cause liabilities after consultations? It means that consideration on the use and the ability to consult the guide will be used to determine liability respectively. Most of the time, the consultation of physicians is considered the inability of the one consulting to decide on their won. In this case, it is considered a form of guidance. There is the element of reliability and the need to make use of the information for subsequent treatment offered. There is need for liability especially when documented hence the need to offer guidance using the standard of care.
Morgan
It is a bit confusing that the line between the ability to seek formal and informal advice is not clear in the medical field. Thus, when does informal advice cause liability? In particular, it is indicated that the level of related liability depends on several factors. Although it is not uncommon to find colleagues seeking informal guidance on how to perform various procedures, it becomes necessary to determine the exact nature in which the guidance will be sort. However, it is a challenge to establish whether the guidance sort is for comparative purposes or for the sole purpose of making diagnostic decisions. In particular, the legal implication of the “curbside consultations” can only be established through their proximate cause to the injur...