Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
7 pages/β‰ˆ1925 words
Sources:
6 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Communications & Media
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 27.72
Topic:

Advantages and Disadvantages of Public Shaming on Social Media

Essay Instructions:

For those of you planning to write about Digital Media, positive sides and negative sides, this is a nice analysis of what many of us already suspect: social media users can compare themselves to others, and feel negative emotions in relation to all of the flattering images that are posted, often with digital filters. Celebrities use makeup artists, stylists and digital filters, influencing millions of young people and teens who may think the images are natural.
For those of you choosing this Topic: you may choose one element (ex: body image) and examine both sides -- teens can express themselves online with selfies and feel confident, but teens can also feel inferior to celebrities or glamorous photos they see. You are asked in this Topic to reflect on the positive and negative elements of digital media (this can include other topics like downloading, piracy, mp3 sharing etc), but this can be the pro and con sides of one issue. You are also allowed to reflect on unrelated topics (ex: Facebook is good for photo sharing with your family, and bad for your privacy from marketers and the government), but connecting the issues you examine is often more interesting.
A further interesting Topic is the failed "Fyre Festival" which some describe as "Instagram, if it came to life." The documentary about Fyre is on Netflix and is having a big influence in terms of "images" vs "reality."
http://www(dot)bbc(dot)com/future/story/20190311-how-social-media-affects-body-image (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

PUBLIC SHAMING ON SOCIAL MEDIA
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Course Code:
Date:
Introduction
Imagine waking up in the morning to find that you are trending on social media platforms purportedly for suing your nephew for an overzealous hug. This is the situation which 54-year-old Jennifer Cowell found herself in October 2015 following a widely publicized and shared story claiming that she had sued her 8-year-old nephew for breaking her wrist while hugging her CITATION Eri151 \l 1033 (Levitz, 2015). The story in the public sphere had left many details which wen narrated out of context changed the story. First, she wanted to sue the insurance company for compensation, and since her attorney insisted that there must be respondent to the case, she reluctantly included her nephew. In Minnesota, the attorney advised her to name the nephew since the case would only proceed if she named a person and not the home insurance company. Thus, to build an impermeable case, Cowell’s attorney advised her to implicate the nephew even though she was against the idea and never sought to take money from her nephew’s family. It was a simple legal procedure that Cowell followed in seeking compensation from the homeowner’s insurance company, but it was completely taken out of context. Following her minutes of infamy, she went on to lose her job and years later she finds it hard to get another job as many employers do not want to be associated with her past although they know her innocence in the case.
This is the power of the internet where people take to the internet to shame others without first verifying the source of their information or even contextualizing it. The motive of social media users to troll others is complicated and multifactorial. Social media users hurl insults and troll innocent people which have devastating short a long-term effect on their lives. Walter Palmer also innocently went trophy hunting in Zimbabwe and killed a 13-year-old male lion which was under environmental protection CITATION Kat151 \l 1033 (Rogers, 2015). He was lynched on the internet and vilified for his actions whilst he did not know of the rarity of the lion and or if it was protected. His dentist clinic and home were vandalized, and he even received death threats. These stories paint a grim picture of the new age of social media and how it is being weaponized by people to destroy the lives of other people. However, public shaming is not entirely wrong, and it has been used as a way to earn justice for millennia. Even in the age of social media, public shaming has been good to compel corporations, powerful individuals to abide by the social order. Recently, the me-too movement has harnessed the power of public shaming and used it to compel high profile individuals to resign, or they are arraigned in court for sexual harassment.
Advantages
Public shaming helps to unite and bring to book criminals and high-profile individuals who otherwise would buy their immunity with their influence or money, i.e. CEOs of big corporations, politicians, wealthy businesspeople, iconic artists etc. Previously, the crimes perpetrated by these individuals were never prosecuted, and their victims never had justice because these individuals could ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!