Draft pf Complete Article Review for Peer-Feedback Arts Essay

FEEDBACK:
It should probably be written, "April 2nd, 1973".
And if he is still alive and considered a researcher, I wouldn't put it in past tense.
Same with "his article evaluated" put this in present tense "evaluates" because text is always present.
Can you mention very briefly what the author claims that influence is that is changing exemplary art?
I wouldn't follow with "That explains", maybe say "this is evidence to support" or "this analysis of influence supports".
Be consistent with your language use of numbers, like if you're using number (123) use numbers throughout, like also for 21st century, or make them all spelled out.
Probably meant "trends" not "trend", maybe specify what kind of trends like are they politically-driven or provocative? because "the use of criticality" doesn't tell me enough about what the author is talking about concerning performance art. This sentence just has a lot of space for being more specific. Criticality in response to what? What does the author argue is the critical intention?
If the death of performance art is the authors argument, specify that the author argues that point. For example "In this article the author argues the death of performance art in China was due to _________".
"tense the need of the author to talk about it [...]" The first half of this sentence is too repetitive, the same point has been mentioned a couple times already, and the second half is redundant. I would just clarify how the representation of violence in art is relevant to changes.
If you use the word "important", what area of research, or what type of readers, is the article important to?
You're giving your opinion about the topic, where I believe you should be giving your opinion (review) of the author's opinion (argument). For example "art is essential work but should help society to grow positivity", redirect the review to the impact of the authors research and the articles relevance studying the art subject/idea.
(I wouldn't say "this paper", just state what the text provides, or find a more formal way to address the article)
(Also be carful with using the word "facts" because this isn't the STEM field of research, it's primarily ideas and research that is constantly changing)
Read over your writing for spelling and grammar.
Overall, there is a lot of repetition that isn't specific enough to give me a good idea of what the author is arguing, and what the current academic setting of the argument is, in terms of scholarly discussions of the topic. Be more specific about the author's ideas/arguments and this will naturally make the review more clear. Also address the research climate around the subject, and make clear what the audience will gain from the reading.
One more detail, (thanks for tolerating my nit-pickiness) If the authors main argument is concerning the death of performance art, and contemporary arts is the surrounding area of research, I would title this review around performance art not broadly contemporary arts.