Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
Other
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 5.18
Topic:

Readings and Discussion:Discovery of Insulin

Coursework Instructions:

Three detailed comments, with each at least 85 words, please!
The comments you post on Perusall will be graded. You will receive an overall grade of 0, 1, 2, or 3 on the assignment. Your grade is based on several factors. The primary ones are:
1. The quality of your top three comments. The goal is for you to demonstrate a thorough reading and insightful interpretation of the passage. In practice, this will require a comment length closer to a paragraph than a one line comment.
2. The distribution of your comments. If all your comments are on a single paragraph or section of the readings, your grade might be slightly reduced. We'll be looking for your comments to be distributed across the entire reading.
3. Time spent reading. If all your comments are posted rapidly one after another, your grade might be slightly reduced.
We recommend that you read and post several detailed comments early in the week (Sun/Mon/Tues).
In summary, to receive the top grade on the assignment, you'll need to contribute at least three comments, each several sentences long. To be safe, contribute more, because we only count the top three; there's no penalty for exceeding three comments. Post these across the reading, not all on a single paragraph.

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

Comments
Your name
Subject and Section
Professor’s Name
Date
1st Comment: Pages 253 to 256. From “The 1923 Nobel Prize in Physiology…” to “…adequate evidence that insulin could consistently be extracted from pancreas and that all the signs and symptoms of diabetes in dogs could be controlled."
The story was about the ownership of the patent for the discovery of insulin as a treatment for diabetes mellitus. The confusion in the recognition ran for decades because the involved individuals in its discovery were fighting over personal gains, such as pride, fame, and becoming the recipient of awards, which probably included monetary gain.
The four individuals involved were Frederick Banting, Charles Best, James J.R. Macleod, and James Collip. The first two and last two were partners. However, most of the recognitions were attributed to Banting and Best, with the latter marked as the assistant of the former, demonstrating that Banting owned the ideas and did all the major highlights of the work (Bliss, 1993, pp. 253-256). This is an issue with intellectual property (IP) allows the scientists to gain recognition from their work for their benefit, but the grants depend on the combined interests of the inventors and the general public. The IP should foster an environment from which it can be used for the good of humanity. In this case, the scientists made the invention considering personal interests over the general public. Nevertheless, the discovery is an IP (WIPO, n.d.).
2nd comment: Pages 257 to 259. From “Best's principal claims in this address…” to “…There was no tossing of coins.”
Best instigated and exaggerated the importance of his contributions to Banting’s works and instilled that he also did the majority of the work right after Banting&rsq...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These Other Coursework Samples: