Rational Choice Theory and Organized Crime

Rational Choice Theory and Organized Crime
Student’s Name
Institution
Rational Choice Theory and Organized Crime
Rational choice theory is a broad concept applied by scholars in most disciplines. It is, however, dominant in areas of economics, social sciences, and ecology. Scholars in criminology and criminal justice reiterate the significance the concept might have in the examination of criminal and crime causes while taking into account the rationale for participating in criminal offense (Pratt, 2008). It is imperative to understand the term rationale and put it in the appropriate context to define the theory clearly. Rational behavior is a logic-driven behavior, where one chooses a particular path based on preferences, beliefs, and constraints. Hence, rational choice theory can be defined as a phenomenon in which an individual makes choices in their best interest (Pratt, 2008). Some scholars put it as the cost-benefit analysis of the choice and consequences.
Criminology is responsible for understanding the breadth and dept of crime and criminal behavior, and also outlining the responsibilities the justice systems have in dealing with crimes. Crime and criminal activities have been there since the beginning of time, and as the society becomes civilized and organized, so do criminals (Galeotti, 2008). This has given rise to the concept of organized crime, a phenomenon that is rampant in contemporary society and executed in various ways. There has been a variation in the definition of the term organized crime, but the aspect of being organized, executed by a group to gain through dubious and illegal means remains inherent (Galeotti, 2008). Crime and criminal behaviors have been closely attributed to natural law and the theories of ethics. Scholars have argued that rational choice theory is also relevant in the understanding of crime, criminal behaviors, and organized crimes.
From a classic criminological perspective, the rational choice theory holds that a person chooses to engage in a criminal activity based on their assessment of the extent of the consequences and the positive gains anticipated (Pratt, 2008). However much the theory becomes inconsequential with the policymakers (Pratt, 2008), it is worthy of consideration just like any other hypothesis that put crimes in its right perspective. The guiding principle is the fact that humans are rational beings, which is not only affirmative but also make perfect sense when it comes to engaging in criminal activities. Crime can be rewarding, fun, or easy to execute. On the flip side, crime can be punishable, thus presenting the two sides necessary to establish a rationale. Besides, the theory also comes in handy in determining the quantum of criminal punishment. Logic expects that as the penalty beco...