Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.5
Topic:

The Processes of Continuous Quality Improvement

Coursework Instructions:

Assignment Overview
One of the leading continuous quality indicators that U.S. health care managers struggle with is population-wide health equity monitoring and improvement. This indicator seems to unfortunately remain isolated from the “mainstream” process of continuous quality improvement. Because of this, health care managers remain relatively uninformed about the health equity impacts of organizational decisions, despite the ease of data gathering and assessment brought about by the advent of electronic health records.
Please read the following article, then answer the Case Assignment questions.
Cookson, R., Asaria, M., & Ali, S. (2018). Health equity monitoring for health care quality assurance. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 198, 148-156. Retrieved from the Trident Online Library.
Case Assignment
How can the monitoring process suggested in the article help in revising the processes used inside the United States? It’s working in England—so could it work in the United States? Why or why not? Justify your answer using credible, peer-reviewed sources.
What are five of the current inequities in the United States health care market that should be addressed? Document each inequity using credible, peer-reviewed sources.
How can each of these inequities be best resolved to the satisfaction of all stakeholders? Explain your ideas for resolving the five inequities to your stakeholders in a few concise paragraphs.
Assignment Expectations
Conduct additional research to gather sufficient information to support your analysis.
Provide a response of 3-5 pages, not including title page and references. It is required that you show the formulas and calculations performed to arrive at your answers.
As we have multiple required items to be addressed herein, please use subheadings to show where you’re responding to each required item and to ensure that none are omitted.
Support your paper with peer-reviewed articles and reliable sources. Use at least two references from peer-reviewed sources. 
and for evaluating internet sources:
Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating internet resources. 
You may use the following source to assist in your formatting your assignment:
Purdue Online Writing Lab. (n.d.). General APA guidelines. 
Paraphrase all source information into your own words carefully, and use in-text citations.

Coursework Sample Content Preview:


Module 4 - Case The Processes of Continuous Quality Improvement
Student's Name
College/University
Course
Professor's Name
Due Date
Monitoring and enhancing health equity throughout the population is one of the main continuous quality metrics that American healthcare administrators find most challenging. Unfortunately, it appears that this signal is still not part of the "mainstream" process of ongoing quality improvement. This is why, despite the ease of data collection and evaluation made possible by the introduction of electronic health records, healthcare managers continue to be mostly ignorant of the effects corporate actions have on health equity. This paper asserts that the monitoring process suggested in Cookson et al.’s (2018) article will work in the United States and offers justifications. It also discusses current inequalities within the United States healthcare market and strategies to address them.
It will Work in the United States.
In the United States, utilizing registered populace data sources from practice catalogs rather than relying on census data of the resident population is preferable. This choice aligns with the legal obligations of the CCGs (Beaney et al., 2022). It illustrates the method's adaptability to Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) in the United States and other contexts where the enlisted populace may not be congruent with the resident populace. In 2015, there were 209 clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) based in England, each catering to an average of 272,000 NHS clients enlisted with community-based family practice (Cookson et al., 2018). CCGs were entrusted with the responsibility of procuring and strategizing healthcare services for the vast residing populaces. In fact, 180 out of the initial 211 CCGs in 2013 were derived from one Primary Care Trust (PCT) or a section of one PCT. It applies to the United States, which has many PCTs. Changes in local population demographics and the adjustments made to accommodate such changes within CCG boundaries did not lead to substantial alterations.
This approach will offer various advantages to the country. It can integrate equity indicators as part of quality assurance measures for 

...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Coursework Samples: