Population-Wide Health Equity Monitoring and Improvement

The Processes of Continuous Quality Improvement
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Instructor
Due Date
The Processes of Continuous Quality Improvement
How Can the Monitoring Process Can Help in Revising the Processes Used Inside the United States
In the article “Health equity monitoring for healthcare quality assurance,” the authors note that quality of care and health equity are crucial issues in the healthcare sector. Based on their essence, efforts by various organizations, such as the Institute for Health Improvement, focus their attention on the inclusion of equity dimensions. Regardless of their efforts to integrate equity and quality, the two progress along different lines (Cookson et al., 2018). Bearing this in mind, the article notes that the English NHS suggests that the monitoring process is crucial in revising processes in healthcare. The monitoring process introduced by the English NHS was focused on internal quality assurance and external public accountability. The bigger picture is that NHS identified equity indicators as vital since they can improve the quality of care and health equity. The new approach shows that monitoring equity indicators, such as healthcare structure as well as processes and outcome quality, helps minimize inequality in the delivery and quality of healthcare services.
The analytical approach suggested by the article is likely to help revise healthcare processes used in the United States. The likelihood of the United States using the monitoring process to revise processes is apparent in that it can be applied through the assimilation of equity metrics into conventional quality assurance, particularly by relevant authorities responsible for planning, purchasing, and delivering health care. Further examination shows that monitoring can help revise the evaluation of equity and quality factors using benchmarks, such as the national average and enrolled clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) (Cookson et al., 2018). Such assessments will help identify the level of health inequality in healthcare organizations. Another vital approach linked to the suggested monitoring process and how the United States can revise the healthcare system is being able to monitor changes as they occur. For instance, changes in equity can be monitored in relation to short-term occurrences and how they affect the delivery of health care. Monitoring the indicators is paramount since they indicate how healthcare equity responds to certain policy changes. This approach to monitoring will help revise policy implementation in a way that the primary focus is on the cost-effective delivery of quality and equity healthcare.
It is Working in England, So It Will Possibly Work in The United States
The monitoring process has been working in England, and it may also work in the United States. The possibility of the monitoring process working in the United States is linked to various factors, such as being primarily focused on achieving healthcare quality and service equity. The two are major areas of concern in the United States’s healthcare facilities, as evidenced by their focus on safety and cost-effectiveness. The biggest shortcoming in the United States healthcare is the...