Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 15.55
Topic:

Nursing Shortage and Patient Outcome. Nursing Coursework

Coursework Instructions:

Literature Review

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
4
Good
89.00%
5
Excellent
100.00%
80.0 %Content

10.0 %Introduction
An introduction is not present.
An introduction is present, but it does not relate to the body of the paper.
An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. There is nothing in the introduction to entice the reader to continue reading.
An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction provides incentive for the reader to continue reading.
An introduction is present, and it relates to the body of the paper. Information presented in the introduction is intriguing and encourages the reader to continue reading.
20.0 %Comparison of Research Questions
No comparison of research questions is presented.
A comparison of research questions is presented, but it is not valid.
A cursory though valid comparison of research questions is presented.
A moderately thorough and valid comparison of research questions is presented.
A reflective and insightful comparison of research questions is presented.
20.0 %Comparison of Sample Populations
No comparison of sample populations is presented.
A comparison of sample populations is presented, but it is not valid.
A cursory though valid comparison of sample populations is presented.
A moderately thorough and valid comparison of sample populations is presented.
A reflective and insightful comparison of sample populations is presented.
20.0 %Comparison of the Limitations of the Study
No comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.
A comparison of the limitations of the study is presented, but it is not valid.
A cursory though valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.
A moderately thorough and valid comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.
A reflective and insightful comparison of the limitations of the study is presented.
10.0 %Conclusion and Recommendations for Further Research
No conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented.
A conclusion and recommendations for further research are presented, but they are not valid.
A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid, but they are cursory.
A conclusion and recommendations for further research are valid and moderately thorough.
A conclusion and recommendations for further research are reflective and insightful.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

5.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format

2.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
3.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

Nursing Shortage and Patient Outcome
Name
Institution
Nursing Shortage and Patient outcome
Introduction
This research is intended to analyze various articles to enhance literature review while making a comparison of; research questions, sample population, and limitations of the study. The purpose of this study is to look at how the questions, sample, and limitation of study influence the foundation of a literature review. They should provide a proper insight on how they will influence the formulation of a literature review. They should as well be realistic to the context of the study.
Comparison of Research questions
There are eight articles with each having its questions to address nursing shortages. These questions are the basis of a literature review in any research. In the first article, the student identifies how a review of strategies can be done to enhance a positive practice environment in a setting or the clinic. In the second article, the student establishes how effective and contemporary policy action can address the nursing shortage. Comparing the two questions, the question in second forms a better base for the research literature review because it provides a wide view of nursing shortage which translates to patients suffering (Johnson et al., 2016).
The question in the third article is on how a comprehensive model of nursing can be developed as well as demands in nursing and the intentions behind leaving their profession. The question in the fourth article seeks to determine how nurses extended hours influence the organizational outcome. If a comparison is made on both questions, the question in the third article can act as a better question in coming up with a comprehensive literature review because if demands are addressed then the factor of nurses (Aboshaiqah, 2016). Leaving the profession fades away.
The question in the fifth article is to identify impact and factors influencing nurses' migration from one state to another, whereas the question in article six is to investigate the cause of nurses' shortage and coming up the solutions to address the same. Comparing the two questions, the question in article five forms a better argument for a literature review because it is wide and tries to look exhaustively on the whole health situation.
The question in article seven is to identify whether delaying retirement for registered nurses could increase the nursing workforce. The question in article eight is to identify the cause of registered nurse shortage and their cyclical responses. When compared, the question in article eight portrays more sense because if the retirement is delayed, then the quality of services will be compromised.
When comparing all questions in all articles and determining a question that would set a good foundation for a good literature review, the question in article five is best suited because it is a question if addressed can provide a long lasting solution to the ailing health sector (Li et al., 2014).
Comparison of Sample Populations
There are different sample populations that the student has addressed in various articles. In article one the sample was taken from registered ages, the status of employees and hours they have worked. The sample in the second art...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Coursework Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now