Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
1 Source
Level:
APA
Subject:
Education
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.75
Topic:

Philosophy 25B (Coursework Sample)

Instructions:
Answer the following PHILOSOPHY questions each question should be 5-7 paragraphs long. 1. On what grounds does Locke deny that there are “innate ideas” in the mind? On what grounds does Kant affirm that every thinker must possess certain “a priori concepts” that are not derived from experience? Is there any disagreement between Kant and Locke on this matter? Why or why not 2. Hume thinks we simply cannot avoid believing that things are connected as cause and effect, given our experience of the world. Kant thinks that if we did not believe that things are connected as cause and effect we could not possibly think of or experience a world at all. In what ways, if any, do Hume and Kant disagree on this matter? 3. Berkeley holds that “the senses perceive nothing which they do not perceive immediately, for they make no inferences.” So everything that is perceived depends for its existence on being perceived. Kant holds that in “Judgments of experience” we perceive the way things are around us, which is the way they would be whether they were perceived or not. In what ways do Berkeley and Kant disagree about how we know things about the world by sense-perception? 4. Is everything that Hume would call a “relation of ideas” what Kant would call an “analytic judgment”? If not, why not? If so, does that mean that everything Hume would call a “matter of fact” is what Kant would call a “synthetic judgment”? If so, does Hume have better reasons for believing that every synthetic judgment (or matter of fact) can be known only on the basis of experience than Kant has for the believing that some of them are knowable only a priori? source..
Content:

PHILOSOPHY 25B
Name:
Grade Course:
Tutor’s Name:
(11th May, 2011)
Philosophy 25B
1. On what grounds does Locke deny that there are “innate ideas” in the mind? On what grounds does Kant affirm that every thinker must possess certain “a priori concepts” that are not derived from experience? Is there any disagreement between Kant and Locke on this matter? Why or why not
When it comes to “innate ideas”, Locke believes that any kind of knowledge that exists comes from the external sense perception and not from the reasoning alone or the ideas we gain before going through the experiences needed. To Locke, an idea that has been accepted by many is not true to him unless there are no other ways for the idea to be discovered and be accepted. He wonders why if the innate ideas are true why they aren’t known by everyone.
2. Hume thinks we simply cannot avoid believing that things are connected as cause and effect, given our experience of the world. Kant thinks that if we did not believe that things are connected as cause and effect we could not possibly think of or experience a world at all. In what ways, if any, do Hume and Kant disagree on this matter?
When a human mind is limited to the things of the world where by, instead of constructing important things, it relies everything from the experience and yet the mind i...
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

  • PICO(T) format
    Description: Undergraduate writing level 1 page Education Format Style English (U.S.) Coursework. PICO(T) format...
    1 page/≈275 words | 2 Sources | APA | Education | Coursework |
  • Show The Color Of Fear Video
    Description: Education: Show The Color Of Fear Video Coursework...
    1 page/≈275 words | 1 Source | APA | Education | Coursework |
  • Foundations of Educational Technology
    Description: Teachers will always help the students to understand and relate to new content as they build on their knowledge...
    7 pages/≈1925 words | 4 Sources | APA | Education | Coursework |
Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!