Evaluation of Different Resume

Resume Peer Reviews
Author’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Code and Name
Professor’s Name
Date
Resume Peer Reviews Sharbel Ghostine Resume Rubric - Peer Review Criteria CommentsInitial Impression view longer description Well-structured, organized, and visually pleasing. Legible font size and formal language used. The intention is to show career aspiration, although Ghostine has no experience in computer programming.Perform a 20-second Review view longer description I managed to gather relevant information from the resume within 20 seconds.Applicant Suitabilityview longer description Twenty seconds was enough to know the applicant’s background, areas of expertise and skills, and the position being applied for. Visual Structureview longer description Font size and color, typography, and the way Ghostine’s resume is organized helped me identify crucial points. They include skills, awards, education, and experience.Perform a 1-Minute Reviewview longer description It took me exactly one minute to read the resume.Overall Impressionview longer description The author did an impressive work of organizing experience and education from the current to the past. Ghostine uses a formal tone, and I found nothing inconsistent. However, it would have been good if the applicant indicated whether the project was complete and how long it had taken to work on it. Grammar Checkview longer description I noticed some minor mechanical errors. For instance, the applicant omitted a comma between “Arabic” and “and Spanish when listing proficient languages.” The author should collect it like this: English, Arabic, and Spanish.Resume Structureview longer description The structure of the resume is good. P-A-R Formulaview longer description In the experience section, the applicant used the project-action-result (P-A-R) formula. However, the individual did not indicate the results obtained from various activities. For instance, did tutoring children in reading, mathematics, writing, and problem-solving help them improve? Were the outcomes measurable? How?Position Descriptionsview longer description The author did not use bullets. I think the skills section should have bullets instead of listing without indication. The person did not use excessive information.
Hanjie Ye Resume Rubric - Peer ReviewCriteria CommentsInitial Impressionview longer description The strength of the resume is its structure and well-organized sections. Font size is good, but the resume is not visually pleasing. The applicant intended to show the skills and experience, which has been done well using a formal tone.Perform a 20-second Reviewview longer description I did not manage to go through more content within 20 seconds.Applicant Suitabilityview longer description The resume makes it easy to identify the applicant’s background, job position, and skills.Visual Structureview longer description Although different sections are well-organized, the resume is not attractive to read. The typography an...