Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
No Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Waldun Forest Products v. IWA Canada

Case Study Instructions:

This is a case study for Human Resources course. I can’t select this in the subject area. (https://www(dot)lrb(dot)bc(dot)ca/media/7384/download?inline)
Access and Read the Case: Waldun Forest Products v. IWA Canada, Local 1-3567 (Links to an external site.) (BCLRB No. B158/93)
Summarize the Case by o utlining the basic facts (in approximately 4-6 sentences) that explain what this case is about. You may use point form as long as you are able to clearly convey the basic facts of the case.
Briefly explain the overall position taken by the Union and by the Employer (in approximately 4-6 sentences). You do not need to explain the positions taken for each individual employee mentioned in this case.
Summarize the LRB’s Analysis and Reasoning for the categories of employees it was asked to adjudicate. NOTE: Your summary should include an explanation as to HOW the LRB reached its conclusions not simply WHAT its conclusions were. This should be the most detailed section of your summary.
Student Analysis
Explain why this case was important to: (a) the Union; (b) the Employer (in approximately 4-6 sentences).
What does this case help you to understand about the LRB, the LR Code and the certification process?
Stepping away from this case in particular, explain in your own words how the relationship and the dynamic between members of the management team and other non-union employees often change with newly unionized employees after certification (in approximately 4-6 sentences).
Format and Helpful Hints for a Successful Case Study
Use clear headings for each of the sections above.
Ensure that you have answered the question asked of you.
The art of summarizing is an important skill. A simple way to ensure you’ve captured the critical components is to write as if your audience has never read the case before. You should review your work to confirm that someone unfamiliar with the issue or the law will be able to follow your summary.
Ensure your work is well-written, proofread and appropriately concise. (The sentence guidelines given above should help limit the length of your work.)
Recognize that the Student Analysis section is designed to give you a chance to show your understanding of the material and apply your knowledge.

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

CASE STUDY
Student’s Name:
Affiliated Institution:
Date:
The case covers the certification procedure for workers in a negotiating unit at Waldun Forest Products Ltd. The union was in charge of this certification application and was required to take the viewpoints of family members, casuals, and management into account. The union successfully implemented its recommendations, which were quickly followed by a claim of unfair treatment from the employee. As a result, the voting box was locked until several contentious problems had been resolved by the Labour Relations Board.
Usually, the Union and Employer each had a general stance on the certification procedure. For example, the Union Concerning Family Members stated that Curtis and Colin Walker's inclusion in the bargaining unit would have resulted in conflict given their strong relationship with their father (owner). Additionally, it contends that because they are members of the management team, Daum, Povlsen, and McBride had to be disqualified. It claims that the remaining challenged employees were part-time casual workers who were required to be eliminated since they did not share a common interest with the regular full-time employees. On the other hand, an employer's general stance toward the two Walker brothers contended that the fact that they are the children of the business's primary owner, Wynn Walker, does not constitute a good enough justification to bar them from employment. The independence in decision-making and many other areas that these two men exhibit help to explain this. The Employer also, contended that Daum, Povlsen, and McBride were neither managers nor a member of the management team. especially since they are not subject to the same obliga...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples: