Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Milwaukee Brewers and Miller Park: Problems and Opportunities

Case Study Instructions:

OVERVIEW
Each Case Study assignment is designed to help the student make application of course content to a real world situation. Read the assigned case study and connect the key issues in the case to assigned readings and presentations. Respond to the questions with direct, thorough responses.
Each case study assignment should include the following:
 Title Page in APA format
 Introduction to the case summarizing the situation
 Questions converted to sub-headings – responses to each question
 Strong conclusion that summarizes the ideas
 APA Style Reference page (as needed)
INSTRUCTIONS
Milwaukee Brewers Case Study
Some years ago, the Milwaukee Brewers’ then-president Bud Selig made the decision that, in order to keep the Brewers in Milwaukee, the organization needed to construct a new stadium. Under the supervision of the new president, Wendy Selig-Prieb (Selig’s daughter), ground was broken for MillerPark on November 9, 1996. In 2000, President Selig-Prieb stated, “The Miller Park era is beginning soon, and with it a renewed vitality for major league baseball in Wisconsin. Accordingly, we are committed to bringing a championship to Wisconsin. Our fans will enjoy a world class ballpark, and also deserve a rewarding game experience.” Selig-Prieb believed that Miller Park would bring fortune to Milwaukee, the surrounding area, and the Brewers; the same is true for any organization that thinks it is necessary to build a multimillion dollar facility. Countless Major league baseball teams all over the nation have considered, are considering, or are in the process of building new stadiums in order to keep players, the community, fans, and team executives happy. Most cities and teams turn to the idea of the new facility when they are facing a buyout, relocation considerations, player and fan dissatisfaction, and so on. Baseball club officials understand that the decision to construct a new facility can often reverse these negatives.
County Stadium, the former home of the Milwaukee Brewers, opened on April 6, 1953, and increased its seating capacity over the years to hold 53,192 fans. Miller Park, on the other hand, holds only 43,000 spectators but features a convertible, fan-shaped roof. Miller Park is a more elaborate establishment than the old County Stadium; it is the extra details found in new stadiums that executives of major league teams believe will help keep their organizations competitive from all angles.
Identify and explain the potential problems and opportunities that both the team and the city might have faced that could have led to the decision to construct a new facility.
1. Use the steps provided in Exhibit 6.1 to decide whether you would have tried to build a new stadium if you were in Selig-Prieb’s shoes.
2. Do you believe that facility construction is a rational decision for (1) team executives, (2) city officials, and (3) local citizens? Explain.
3. Should team executives, city officials, and local citizens all be able to participate in the decision-making process of building a new stadium? Explain the advantages and disadvantages of including all of these individuals.
4. When making decisions about building a new facility, what type of decision style(s) and problem attributes are most relevant and important? Explain.
5. Identify how Miller Park has helped or hindered the Brewers organization by finding statistics from attendance records at County Stadium in 1999 and comparing them to current records at Miller Park. With what you have learned, and with any additional information you have found, justify whether or not the decision to build the stadium was a positive move for the team.
6. Go online to locate another organization that has recently built or is currently considering building a new facility. Use that organization’s website to try to identify what led to that decision. Include any information regarding the funding options associated with facility construction. Suggest some possible alternatives to facility construction, if appropriate.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

CASE STUDY: MILWAUKEE BREWERS
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Instructor
Date
From the case study, Milwaukee Brewers bump into various potential challenges and prospects that may have prompted their choice to build a new stadium. These included the possibility of a buyout or relocation, concerns from players and fans, and an outdated County Stadium. President Wendy Selig-Prieb believed that constructing Miller Park would benefit the organization and the community. This study aims to analyze the issues and opportunities the Brewers faced, which may have influenced the decision to build Miller Park. As well, it will explore the decision-making process, decision style, and funding options associated with constructing a new facility.
Potential Problems and Opportunities
The decision to construct a new facility for the team and city may have been motivated by factors such as an increase in fan attendance and revenue, heightened competition from neighboring teams, and a desire to provide a more contemporary and upscale venue for players and supporters. If I were in the position of Selig-Prieb, I would have utilized the steps outlined in Exhibit 6.1 to assess the feasibility of constructing a new stadium. Initially, I would comprehensively analyze the current circumstances to identify any challenges or advantages. Subsequently, I would evaluate several potential solutions, and perform a thorough cost-benefit analysis to determine the most economically viable option. Ultimately, considering both financial and non-financial factors, I would carefully consider the immediate and long-term impacts of the verdict to construct a new stadium.
Decision-Making Process and Decision Style
Constructing a new facility is frequently a logical decision for team executives, as it can address various challenges they may face, such as player and fan dissatisfaction or relocation considerations. Furthermore, the construction of new stadiums frequently entails the implementation of improved amenities that enhance the overall game experience for fans and consequently attract a larger number of attendees, ultimately bolstering team revenue (Delloitte, 2018). From the perspective of municipal authorities, the decision to construct a new facility is often judicious, given the economic advantages it brings to the locality. These include creating employment opportunities, augmented tax revenue derived from the stadium and its accompanying businesses, and the potential to attract additional enterprises to the region. Additionally, it engenders social benefits, such as heightened civic pride and a sense of communal cohesion among local inhabitants. Consequently, residents can support the construction of a new facility due to the manifold advantages it bestows upon the area. These include increased job opportunities, additional revenue for the city, and enhanced civic pride. Moreover, a new facility provides expanded recreational and entertainment options for the local population.
Benefits of Including Stakeholders in the Decision-Making Process
Several advantages come from including various stakeholders in the decision-making process whe...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now