Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Management case study Case Study Research Coursework

Case Study Instructions:

 

 

 

Assignment 1  

 

 

Course Name: Organizational Behavior

Student’s Name:

Course Code: MGT301

Student’s ID Number:

Semester: 1st

CRN:

Academic Year:

 

For Instructor’s Use only

Instructor’s Name: Dr xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Students’ Grade:  Marks Obtained/ 05

Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low

 

Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY

  • The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.
  • Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.
  • Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.
  • Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions.
  • All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
  • Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted.

 

 

 

Course Learning Outcomes-Covered

1

Demonstrate a clear understanding of human work behavior in the organizational setting and the implications of organizational behavior in the process of management (Lo 1.2).

2

Recognize the impact of organizational culture on shaping values, attitudes and behavior (Lo 1.9).

 

Assignment 1

Reference Source:

Textbook:-

Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). Organizational behaviour: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed). Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

 

Case Study: -

Case: Google

Please read the case “Google” from Chapter 6Motivation.” Page: - 187 given in your textbook – Organizational behaviour: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed).  by Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019) and Answer the following Questions: 

Assignment Question(s):

 

1.   Do you agree with Bock that star performers should get a lot more—not just a little more—than average performers? If someone earning a 3 on Google’s evaluation system gets a 2 percent raise, what should employees earning 4’s and 5’s get? (1.25 Marks )

2.   Given the budget issues created by giving star performers more, should someone earning a 3 get a 2 percent raise—or should they get less? What are the arguments for and against a 2 percent raise level for average performers? (1.25 Marks )

3.   Consider all the things Google’s People Operations group does to motivate its employees. Which motivation theories do they seem to be leveraging, and how? (1.25 Marks )

Part:-2 

Discussion question: Page: -167, please see the table and read carefully and then give your answers on the basis of your understanding.

 

4.   Which of the outcomes in Table 6-2 are most appealing to you? Are you more attracted to extrinsic outcomes or intrinsic outcomes? Do you think that your preferences will change as you get older? (1.25 Marks )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Answer:

1.

 

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Google Case Study
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Google Case Study
Question 1
Yes, I agree with Bock that star performers should get more pay in Google Company. The best people in an organization should be known by worth by providing high wages and incentives. The Google evaluation system ranges from 1 to 5 (Colquitt, LePine & Wesson 2019). Top-rated employees should earn more than those getting an average rating. The 5’s contributes over ten times the average performers in Google. The bigger rewards for the high performers and smaller rewards for the poorer performers focus on making employees aim higher. The 3’s and 4’s should aim to become 5’s in getting the high rewards provided to the top performers in the company. If an employee earning a 3 on Google’s evaluation system gets a 2 percent raise and employees with 4’s or 5’s should get a 3 percent raise. Employees become more productive when motivating factors are harder.
Question 2
A person will perform optimally by knowing that the earning percent will rise with an increase in evaluation rating. According to Colquitt, LePine, and Wesson (2019) equity theory in rewarding the 3’s, 4’s, and 5’s will reduce the recognition to the top performers in Google. The employees with a 3 will feel comfortable and motivated having a 2percentage raise in income. The giving of star performer more is crucial in providing a motivation factor to the other employees with a 3. The average performers should have a payment increase in reducing cases of inefficiency in delivering services. The efforts of average employees should be recognized by giving them the 2-percentage raise.
The opposing view for rewarding average employees focuses on increasing the core activities of Google. The increase in income for average employees will make Google employees with 3 feel relaxed with their performance in the company. The opposing side explains that Google should not tolerate average performance by not offering the 3’s with a 2 percent raise.
Question 3
...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!