Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
5 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Case Study
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 9.72
Topic:

Pharmacotherapy for Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders

Case Study Instructions:

Write a 1+ page paper that addresses the following:
Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis. What labs would you order?
Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. All papers submitted must use this formatting.
To Prepare
Review the case study assigned by your Instructor for this Assignment
Reflect on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and drugs currently prescribed.
Think about a possible diagnosis for the patient. Consider whether the patient has a disorder related to the gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary system or whether the symptoms are the result of a disorder from another system or other factors, such as pregnancy, drugs, or a psychological disorder.
Consider an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
Case study assigned:
Patient HL comes into the clinic with the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The patient has a history of drug abuse and possible Hepatitis C. HL is currently taking the following prescription drugs:
Synthroid 100 mcg daily
Nifedipine 30 mg daily
Prednisone 10 mg daily
Flagyl 500 mg TID
Metronidazole 250 mg daily
Vitals:
Temp: 98.8oF
Wt: 155 lbs
Ht: 5’7”
BP: 136/82
HR: 90 bpm
PE:
Eyes: EOMI
HENT: Normal
GI: Nondistended, minimal tenderness
Skin: Warm and dry
Neuro: Alert and Oriented
Psych: Appropriate mood
Learning Resources
Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Rosenthal, L. D., & Burchum, J. R. (2021). Lehne’s pharmacotherapeutics for advanced practice nurses and physician assistants (2nd ed.) St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Chapter 64, “Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease” (pp. 589–597)
Chapter 65, “Laxatives” (pp. 598–604)
Chapter 66, “Other Gastrointestinal Drugs” (pp. 605–616)
Chapter 80, “Antiviral Agents I: Drugs for Non-HIV Viral Infections” (pp. 723–743)
Chalasani, N., Younossi, Z., Lavine, J. E., Charlton, M., Cusi, K., Rinella, M., . . . Sanya, A. J. (2018). The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology, 67(1), 328–357. Retrieved from https://aasldpubs(dot)onlinelibrary(dot)wiley(dot)com/doi/pdf/10.1002/hep.29367
This article details the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Review this article to gain an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology as well as the suggested pharmacotherapeutics that might be recommended to treat this disorder.
RUBRIC TO ASSIGNMENT
Name: NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Explain your diagnosis for the patient, including your rationale for the diagnosis.
23 (23%) - 25 (25%)
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the diagnosis for the patient, including an accurate and thorough rationale for the diagnosis that supports clinical judgment.
20 (20%) - 22 (22%)
The response provides a basic explanation of 1-2 diagnoses for the patient, including an accurate rationale for the diagnosis that may support clinical judgment.
18 (18%) - 19 (19%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate or vague rationale for the diagnosis that may or may not support clinical judgment.
0 (0%) - 17 (17%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate and vague rationale for the diagnosis that does not support clinical judgment, or is missing.
Describe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
The response accurately and completely describes in detail an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
The response describes a basic explanation of the appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient's history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.
Justify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.
27 (27%) - 30 (30%)
The response provides an accurate, clear, and detailed justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient.
The response includes specific, accurate, and detailed examples that fully support the justification provided.
24 (24%) - 26 (26%)
The response provides a basic justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient.
The response includes only 1-2 examples that fully support the justification provided.
21 (21%) - 23 (23%)
The response provides an inaccurate or vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient.
The response may include examples, which may inaccurately or vaguely support the justification provided.
0 (0%) - 20 (20%)
The response provides an inaccurate and vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient, or is missing.
The response does not include examples that support the justification provided, or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1–2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3–4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding
Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 (5%) - 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors
4 (4%) - 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1–2) APA format errors
3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3–4) APA format errors
0 (0%) - 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6521_Week4_Assignment_Rubric

Case Study Sample Content Preview:

Case Study
Student’s Name
Course
Institution Affiliation
The Patient’s Scenario
Patient HL comes into the clinic with the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The patient has a history of drug abuse and possible Hepatitis C. HL is currently taking the following prescription drugs:
Synthroid 100 mcg daily
Nifedipine 30 mg daily
Prednisone 10 mg daily
Flagyl 500 mg TID
Metronidazole 250 mg daily
Diagnosis for the patient
Although there are several factors that can produce nausea and vomiting, these symptoms are also frequently brought on by the consumption of chemicals or medicines, gastrointestinal problems, or metabolic abnormalities (Rosenthal, & Burchum, 2021). It is crucial to investigate the variables that could be causing the nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea experienced by patient HL in this particular case study. The most frequent symptoms from most patients are nausea and vomiting, which can range from pain to a queasy feeling to uncontrolled vomiting (Alvarez et al., 2021). A patient has to be evaluated further mostly if they have nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea as a result of a medicine or as an adverse response to a treatment. The patient in the case study is using Synthroid, Nifedipine, and Prednisone at the moment. The physician may ensure that these symptoms are not merely potential side effects or an undesirable response by breaking down each medicine separately. In addition, drug abuse is a history associated with the patient. Having said that, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea can all also be symptoms of drug withdrawal. The sort of medicine the patient was withdrawing from would determine the course of treatment for this kind of reason. For instances, pituitary thyrotropin suppression and hypothyroidism are treated with Synthroid. Diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, and irritability are all side effects. Nifedipine is frequently used for hypertension and angina. Headaches, nausea, vomiting, lightheadedness, heartburn, muscular cramps, and constipation are typical adverse effects.
The patient's existing pharmaceutical regimen would be the next consideration. Vomiting and nausea are po...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Case Study Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!