Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Harvard
Subject:
Education
Type:
Article Critique
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 13.37
Topic:

Reliable science or a set of blunt tools? Article Critique

Article Critique Instructions:


Terry Wrigley's paper needs to be critiqued exploring (some of) the following questions:
What is the main contribution to knowledge that the paper is claiming?
What conceptual frameworks / theories are being quoted?
What wider body of knowledge is the author drawing on?
What is the core methodology that underpins the research?
How was the data collected?
How was the data analysed?
Does the evidence / argument presented substantiate the claims being made?
Does the author have a biased / prejudiced position?
PDF for Terry Wrigley paper:
file:///C:/Users/lavak/Documents/ISOC/Wrigley_2018%20(1).pdf
Other Papers that can be included in the analysis:
Biesta (2010) Why What Works Still Won't Work: From Evidence Based Education to Values Based EducationPreview the document. Studies in the Philosophy of Education. 29 pp491-503:
file:///C:/Users/lavak/Documents/ISOC/Biesta_2010_Whatworks%20(1).pdf
Chartered College of Teaching (2018) Bringing Evidence into the classroom: Why teachers need to take control of research:
file:///C:/Users/lavak/Documents/ISOC/CCT_2018%20(1).pdf
Cochran Smith (2003) The Unforgiving Complexity of Teaching
file:///C:/Users/lavak/Documents/ISOC/Cochran-Smith_2003_2%20(1).pdf
Consider this idea of "What works". Dylan Wiliam said, "Everything works somewhere, nothing works everywhere" Do you agree with this? You can listen to the podcast from Wiliam at the following link:
http://www(dot)mrbartonmaths(dot)com/blog/dylan-wiliam-author-researcher-trainer-and-assessment-for-learning-expert
There has been a move in recent years to involve more cognitive science in education - though much of educational theory comes from this background (e.g. Skinner, Ausubel, Piaget, Bruner, Bloom etc...) and with a movement to finding out "What works?". This session will explore this idea asking if this is naive and exploring the kinds of research and ideas that those involved in education should be taking part in and also at what level teachers need to be involved in the "evidence game" should they be evidence aware, evidence informed or evidence creators?

Article Critique Sample Content Preview:

THE POWER OF EVIDENCE: RELIABLE SCIENCE OR A SET OF BLUNT TOOLS
Student
Course
Professor
University
City (State)
Date
The Power of Evidence: Reliable Science or a Set of Blunt Tools
Cognitive science has found immense use in education today. Various analysts have taken a step to digging into the details of how evidence can influence education. In the article "The power of 'evidence': Reliable science or a set of blunt tools?" Wrigley examines the "privileging of randomized controlled trials and their statistical synthesis or meta-analysis." The analysis has also considered two notable third-level statistical syntheses, including teaching and learning toolkit and visible learning project, all of which are critical elements in developing contemporary teaching methods (Wrigley, 2018). Admittedly, the paper's contribution to existing knowledge is immense, and experts can draw and develop knowledge that can be useful in advancing the field. Fundamentally, the author has taken an in-depth look at critical facets, including ideological effects, philosophical implications, and technical shortcomings, all of which are geared towards coming up with implicit empiricism of epistemological and ontological shortcomings.
The author has quoted various theories that they have used to buttress various points in the paper. Foremost, the theory that has informed the structure of the research is the critical realism paradigm. This paradigm can be referred to as the branch of philosophy that distinguishes between the real and the observable world. Other theories referenced in the article are epistemological and ontological paradigms. Epistemology refers to the assumptions that humans have about knowledge.
In contrast, ontology refers to a set of concepts and theories in a given field of knowledge and the way they are related (Wrigley, 2018). The author has used these theories in a way that has allowed him to explore the subject matter comprehensively. The author's wider body of knowledge is trying to draw from is 'evidence.' In the opening of the paper, the author gives a brief introduction to the research and outlays an overview and breakdown of what is contained in the paper. Here, he notes the approach that the paper will give the concept of 'evidence' as he tries to add knowledge to his audience. Even though the subject area is evidence, the specific field he explores is 'evidence-based teaching.'
The core methodology that underpins the research ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to art essays:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!
Order Now