Fatigue, Distress, and Quality of Life after Chemotherapy
Your paper should be 5 – 7 pages. It is written in a scholarly format. Do not use the word “I” or say “I think.” Your paper will read like a research article. The paper must follow the guidelines of the American Psychological Association Manual, 6th or 7th edition. Your presentation must be well reasoned and objective. Your paper must clearly articulate whether or not you agree or disagree with the author and the findings.
The following are some questions you may want to address in your critique no matter what type of article you are critiquing. (Use your discretion. These points don’t have to be discussed in this order, and some may not be pertinent to your particular article.)
1. Is the title of the article appropriate and clear
2. Is the abstract specific, representative of the article, and in the correct form?
3. Is the purpose of the article made clear in the introduction?
4. Do you find errors of fact and interpretation?
5. Is all of the discussion relevant?
6. Has the author cited the pertinent, and only the pertinent, literature? If the author has included inconsequential references, or references that are not pertinent, suggest deleting them.
7. Have any ideas been overemphasized or underemphasized? Suggest specific revisions.
8. Should some sections of the manuscript be expanded, condensed or omitted?
9. Are the author’s statements clear? Challenge ambiguous statements. Suggest by examples how clarity can be achieved, but do not merely substitute your style for the author’s.
10. What underlying assumptions does the author have?
11. Has the author been objective in his or her discussion of the topic?
1. Is the objective of the experiment or of the observations important for the field?
2. Are the experimental methods described adequately?
3. re the study design and methods appropriate for the purposes of the study?
4. Have the procedures been presented in enough detail to enable a reader to duplicate them?
Oh, P. J., & Cho, J. R. (2020). Changes in fatigue, psychological distress, and quality of life after chemotherapy in women with breast cancer: A prospective study. Cancer Nursing, 43(1), E54-E60. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000689.
Student Name
Instructor Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Number and Name
Due Date
Oh, P. J., & Cho, J. R. (2020). Changes in fatigue, psychological distress, and quality of life after chemotherapy in women with breast cancer: A prospective study. Cancer Nursing, 43(1), E54-E60. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000689. The article “Changes in fatigue, psychological distress, and quality of life after chemotherapy in women with breast cancer: A prospective study” by Pok-Ja Oh and Jung-Ran Cho has a concise and direct title appropriate for the report’s context. Its title is prolific and vivid since it gives the reader an immediate sense of the article’s expectations and how to approach it chronologically. It is well-structured by following the recommended formula of an abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, conclusion, and references. Abstract Polit and Beck (2018) indicate that research articles first introduce the reader to the synopsis. It should include a study’s critical information, including the study design, aim or purpose, findings, and conclusions. Based on these criteria, this article has a precise abstract. It is also appropriately completed since it uses a bold feature to highlight critical components such as objectives, methods, results, and conclusions (Cho & Cho, 2020). Thus, it incorporates critical components that Polit and Beck (2018) highlighted to familiarize the reader with the entire article. Research Problem, Purpose, and Hypothesis Polit and Beck (2018) indicate that the primary role of introduction is to familiarize the readers with context and research problem. The section incorporates research questions, variables, and the study’s significance. Cho and Cho (2020) satisfy some of these requirements but fails to integrate others in their research paper. For instance, the study’s research problem was the issue of changes in fatigue and psychological stress that occur in women with breast cancer after chemotherapy sessions, which is relevant to current nursing care needs. Although the article does not explicitly state the purpose statement and hypothesis, it outlines the objectives in the abstract and introduction (Oh & Cho, 2020). Although they fail to communicate and word these sections, the authors place them logically in this study. Moreover, it does not classify the independent (psychological distress and fatigue) and dependent (quality of life) variables, but a reader can identify them in the introduction because they are mentioned. Such aspects closely agree with guidelines outlined by Polit and Beck (2018). However, it integrates the research problem in the review. Literature Review Polit and Beck (2018) state that this section contextualizes the research problem by exploring related studies. Although the article does not have a section dedicated to the literature review, the authors incorporate it in ...
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to stress:
- How Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms Affect Ariana Grande5 pages/≈1375 words | APA | Psychology | Essay |
- Personal Writing: Coping with Stress1 page/≈275 words | APA | Psychology | Essay |
- The Role of Acculturative Stress on Mental Health Symptoms for Immigrant Adolescence3 pages/≈825 words | APA | Literature & Language | Book Review |
- Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Basis, Criteria, Diagnosis, Opinion, and Treatment3 pages/≈825 words | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- Questions on Stress and Related Mental Disorders2 pages/≈550 words | MLA | Psychology | Coursework |
- How Social Media Use and Stress Affect Adolescents’ Sleeping Patterns1 page/≈275 words | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Other (Not Listed) |
- Emotional Stress in Emotional Eating Data Collection Process2 pages/≈550 words | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Other (Not Listed) |