Internet Good Or Not Good: Impact On The Young People (Annotated Bibliography Sample)
Create an annotated bibliography detailing six (6) sources you will use in your Researched Argument paper (Essay 3). At least 3 of the 6 sources must be scholarly sources drawn from the library’s databases or from books. You may use sources from the Argument Analysis and Argument Synthesis assignments if you wish, but you are not required to do so.
Your annotations should:
- Begin with a full citation that complies with MLA Style (8th Edition)
- Identify the author(s) and his/her/their credibility on the subject
- Describe the text’s main point and purpose
- Evaluate/analyze the text’s methods/argument
- Explain how the source will fit into your research and argument of Essay 3
For each source in an annotated bibliography, the same bibliographic information included in a Works Cited list is provided. Similarly, your annotated bibliography should be in alphabetical order. Each reference includes a concise paragraph that retains details from the sources that are pertinent to your focus. An annotation might also note special features such as table or illustrations. Usually, an annotation evaluates the source by analyzing its usefulness, reliability, and overall significance for understanding the topic. Each short paragraph should be around half a page (not exceeding ¾ of a page). Use the example source annotation provided for you on the back of this document as a guide.source..
Internet Good or not Good
Blinka, Lukas. The “good” and the “bad” of the internet: Studying subjective well-being as an outcome of young people's online practices. University of Tartu Press. 2013.
In his article titled The “good” and the “bad” of the internet: Studying subjective well-being as an outcome of young people's online practices, Lukas an academic is quick to offer his piece on this issue of the internet and its impact to the world. He centers his study on the young people who he correctly describes as the most prominent group of internet users. Lukas is a man who believes in research, and his article is evidence enough. He takes his readers slowly through his article and states the problem of his study. From this point, he slowly embarks on a serious yet evidence packed elucidation of his topic. Lukas then proceeds to show the good side of the internet and then slowly embarks on a journey which shows the bad side of the internet.
The article is indeed relevant in this debate and Lukas makes some great points noting how blogging and information accessibility are made increasingly possible with the internet. However, he also talks about the bad of the internet by noting how it may lead to the deterioration of social ties as well as the separation of people from natural experience. I, therefore, believe his article will be a great addition to my research.
Carr, Nicholas. The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. S.l.: W. W. Norton & Company, 2011. Internet resource.
Nicholas Carr is the man responsible for the question “Is Google Making Us Stupid.” In his widely celebrated article in the Atlantic Monthly, Carr helped the world to see how increased reliance on Google and other search engines is making people sacrifice their innate ability to read, think critically, as well as creativity. In his book, The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains, Carr is presenting some great points as he looks at the society objectively and the impact the internet has had on it. He provides his readers with an obvious but often ignored contrast by showing the big difference between books and the internet. With books, he reveals how we were forced to go sequentially while being deeply engaged which is the opposite with the internet which expects speed when it comes to consuming information. He notes how people today are good at scanning and skimming through documents but unknowingly to them they are losing on concentration, reflection, and contemplation.
If anyone deserves a platform to discuss the internet and its effects or impact is Nicholas Carr. This man made the world to think and rethink their increased dependence on Google. Here, however, he expands his wings and challenges the world and its over-reliance on the internet. There is no doubt that his work needs to be in my article.
Coombs, Danielle S, and Simon Collister. Debates for the Digital Age: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Our Online World. , 2016. Print.
Coombs, an associate director and associate professor in the School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Kent State University, partnered with Collister, a senior lecturer in the School of Media at London College of Communication to deliver this masterpiece. Being people who often interact and use the in
- Representations And Discourses Of The American Dream In FilmDescription: The "American Dream" means that as long as the person starts working hard and follow their dream, thus it can lead to a better life. Equal opportunity is the soul of the "American Dream."...3 pages/≈825 words | 10 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Annotated Bibliography |
- Plastic Pollution: Biological EnvironmentDescription: Plastic pollution entails the accumulation of plastic products whether used or unused to the environment that has adverse effects on the marine life, soil, and the biological environment....6 pages/≈1650 words | 4 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Annotated Bibliography |
- Why The Arguments About Gun Control Are Wrong?Description: In this article, titled Why the Arguments against Gun Control are wrong, Burke provides his readers with an in-depth analysis of some of the arguments against gun control....2 pages/≈550 words | 4 Sources | MLA | Literature & Language | Annotated Bibliography |