John Stuart Mill’s Philosophies on Justice and Utilitarianism

Name:
Instructor:
Course:
Date:
John Stuart Mill’s Philosophies on Justice and Utilitarianism
John Stuart Mill vigorously maintained utilitarianism, widely regarded as its leading proponent during the Victorian era. Utilitarianism is a way of thinking about ethics that focuses on the result rather than the process. When it comes to ethical decision-making, a utilitarian approach suggests a path of action that best serves the general welfare of the greatest good for the greatest number. John’s understanding of the Principle of Utility was the basis for all of his ideas. The Principle of Utility, according to utilitarianism, trumped all other moral norms. It is consistent with the notions of equity and fairness. On the other hand, Mill's philosophy of morality and justice has been assailed by those who believe in the importance of utility, and some continue to do so to undermine Mill's thesis. This paper will provide an overview of Mill's opinions on these subjects. It will attempt to defend those ideas or at the very least demonstrate its stand on justice and utilitarianism.
Justice Integration is the Obstacle to Utilitarian Theory
The final chapter of Mill's work is devoted to justice. In his view, acts of injustice are met with fury (Fuchs 139). A moral theory cannot ignore this emotion because of its immediacy and intensity. One interpretation is that humans are born with an inherent sense of justice; the other interpretation is that there is a universal and self-evident standard of justice. Mill analyses these two theories, and according to him, the Utilitarian theory faces a severe challenge because of the absence of explicit consideration of justice. As Mill sees it, this is a serious problem because both meanings are incompatible with his point of view.
Justice Is the Transition of the Drive to Vengeance
In addition, Mill characterizes justice as the transition of the drive to retribution for supposed mortifications of all sorts of integration of justice as the one essential impediment to utilitarian theories. Mill portrays vengeance as an "animal desire" (Mill 250) that serves the "self-preservation instinct." Interventions in areas of influence and interest become less likely when it is known that the individual will not accept them. Because of the potential for retaliation, hostile behavior is deterred from occurring in the first place. To put it another way, having a reputation for being vengeful may help one survive in the long term.
Justice for Social Sympathies
According to John's theory, people can empathize to the degree where the enjoyment of others might trigger their happiness or grief. An injury to a person or animal can have a similar effect as an injury to oneself. In the same way, Mill thinks that the animal desire for vengeance extends to those with whom we have strong feelings. The use of social impulses to amplify the revenge drive is a positive development in the refinement of human motivation. People become outraged when their tribe members' interests are disrespected or standard social rules are disregarded.
Justice is Propelled by Desire to Revenge
According to John's perspective, once a society's moral code is examined, people weigh the repercussions ...