Collaborative and Inclusive Approach or Decisive and Top-Down Style in Business

Student's Name
Instructor
Course Code & Name
Date
Researched Argument Essay
There is a wide range of leadership models whose application is driven by the situation under which a manager functions. With this in mind, it must be recognized that the choice of a particular leadership style over another may raise a controversy regarding the personality and goals of a leader. Among the most pertinent topics in management are democratic versus authoritarian. Leaders should choose between a collaborative and inclusive approach or a decisive and top-down style in the ever-changing business landscape. This essay will evaluate such sophisticated arguments from the viewpoint of management careers. The nuanced argument presents that organizational performance needs an adaptive and responsive leadership approach that integrates democratic and authoritarian aspects. The essay will conduct a critical research analysis to ascertain how such a hybrid approach addresses the needs of contemporary organizations and fosters employee engagement, creativity, satisfaction, and adaptability.
Authoritarian Leadership
While authoritarian leadership has faults, it can be effective in certain organizational circumstances, especially those that need swift decision-making and hierarchical clarity. Top-down authoritarian leadership emphasizes a transparent chain of command and quick implementation. Authoritarian leadership can help organizations survive in fast-paced, high-stakes contexts like crises. In critical moments, having a single decision-maker or a small group at the helm can prevent delays and ensure a focused response, which is crucial for navigating unforeseen challenges. Decisive leadership also boosts organizational efficiency. Making quick judgments without extensive consultations helps streamline procedures and implement strategies. Authoritarian leaders can create a sense of order and discipline, reducing the likelihood of confusion or resistance within the organizational structure. It is vital to recognize authoritarian leadership's limitations. It may limit creativity and staff involvement. Ogbeibu et al. (15) argue that "OCs (Organizational Cultures) that are hierarchical often negatively influence employee creativity by inhibiting the exchange of creative ideas." The above perspectives show that authoritarian leadership works best in situations requiring quick choices and a transparent chain of command. Such supports the idea that authoritarian leadership can help organizations adapt and survive crises or industries that require protocol.