Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
4 pages/β‰ˆ1100 words
Sources:
10 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Communications & Media
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 19.01
Topic:

Comparative Analysis Paper on Thor (2011) and Thor Ragnarok (2017)

Research Paper Instructions:

PART II: CAP Outline and Bibliography (due by end of week 5): Now that you've informally described the two films through the proposal, create an outline of the essay you intend to write. One of the best ways to write a successful final essay is to draft a great outline. Your outline should contain:
A) Thesis statement - one statement that summaries your entire paper
For example:
B) 15-30 bullet points that briefly touch upon each cinematic aspect in BOTH films (cinematography, editing, non-diegetic sound, diegetic sound, directing, screenplay/dialog, and special effects if any are used)
C) 80% of the essay/outline must focus on the core cinematic elements
• Cinematography Original vs. Sequel (use of close-up shots, camera panning, great mise-en-scene, blue color tones)
• Editing Original vs. Sequel (continuity editing, cross-cutting, etc.)
• Sound Original vs. Sequel (diegetic and non-diegetic)
• Screenwriting Original vs. Sequel (e.g. the dialogue between the characters were witty; iconic line "I'll be back" in the Terminator)
• Special effects Original vs. Sequel (e.g. green screen compositing)
• Directing Original vs. Sequel (director challenges what it means to be an athlete with disabilities)
• Overall, Director A does a better job with x, y, z; or Director B does a better job with x, y, z.
D) Bibliography with 5-10 resources/references to supplement your paper
A good outline should lay a solid foundation for what you plan to write. Drafting an elaborate outline will do most of the difficult work involved in writing the final CAP. If it is done well, you should merely need to 'fill in the blanks' for your final essay. Thus, invest the time to view both films and write down all the cinematic observations on a Word document. Then organize your observations in a structured way from beginning to end.
GRADING CRITERIA - POINT SYSTEM:
Thesis statement: one sentence that summarizes your paper 20
Minimally 15 bullet points 20
Bullet list should be concise but specific to the films chosen
(PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED EXAMPLE.) 20
Overall structure - 80% core cinematic elements:
• Cinematography (camera angles, camera movement, lighting, mise-en-scene)
• Editing (continuity editing, montage sequence, cross-cutting, fade in/fade out, dissolves)
• Diegetic and non-diegetic sound
• Screenplay (dialog)
• Special effects (if any)
• Directing (character portrayal, unfolding of story, message of film) 20
Bibliography 20
Please use the below 2 films proposals for this course work as its part of this project. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you
For my comparative analysis paper, the two films I have chosen to discuss include the 2011 film called Thor, directed by Kenneth Branagh, and its 2017 sequel called Thor: Ragnarok, directed by Taika Waititi. While the first movie was descent, it was not as thrilling as the second one. Even the second film did not thrill the audience as the third one did.
I chose the films to assess the role that directors play in ensuring that a film appeals to the public. I wish to assess how the events that directors incorporate in the film among other additions influence the public’s perception of the film. It will be interesting to establish the reasons for the success of the third film compared to the first two.
My initial thoughts on the films is that in the third film, the director know how and when to invoke the viewer’s emotions. It is important that in film production, the emotions evoked should directly relate to the plot. In the first film, the directors seem to have intended to paint Chris Hemsworth, the protagonist, as a demigod who carries along a hammer in a world that featured many giants. however, the preceding events might have affected the viewers’ emotions to an extent that they lost interest.
I came upon the film in a movie shop, where I had gone to shop for a film for the weekend. After watching the first film, I was not impressed. however, the film had some form of suspense that made me check out the second one. Unfortunately, the second one too did not impress and after reading the reviews of the third one, I decided to also check it out. In my perspective, I think the third one is much better than the other two.

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:

Outline and Bibliography
Student's Name
Institution
Course
Professor's Name
Date
Thesis Statement
Both Thor and Thor Ragnarok are similar in scene development, cinematography, editing, sound use, and lighting, with some characters also possessing a similar development from the beginning to the end, although a slight difference exists in the lighting and setting.
Cinematography
Thor (Kenneth Branagh 2011)
* Most scenes are shot in natural, low-key light aided by artificial lights in the form of traditional lightings handheld by the characters.
* Most scenes shot in low-key lights are those presenting the other realms apart from the earth. Other realms like Asgard are golden to show the difference between the earth and the other realms.
* Scenes shot in bright natural light present stories from the earth. The aim is to show authenticity that earth exists. Unlike the other realms, the audience sees strange ways of life.
* The film uses heavy close-up and medium close-up shots with selective use of long and extreme long shots. The purpose is to allow the audience to read the facial expressions of the characters.
* Branagh uses a mixture of high and low-angle shots. The high camera angle is used on scenes set on earth to show the superiority of earth in reality. Low key angles of scenes shot on Asgard and Jotunheim aim at undermining their perceived superiority.
* Panning and zoom techniques are extensively used to create establishing shots and focus on various scenes and characters.
* There is a balance in scenes shot on earth and in the other realms like Asgard and Jotunheim.
Thor: Ragnarok (Taika Waititi 2017)
* Waititi employs extensive use of medium and closes up shots throughout the film.
* The film combines various camera techniques, including pan and zoom, to focus on specific scenes and character behavior.
* Most scenes are shot in low-key lighting with dull scenes to draw the audience's focus from believing the content of the outside worlds like Asgard, which may not exist in reality.
* Other scenes use artificial lighting induced by the characters using torches to illuminate their ways in various scenes.
* Most scenes use natural lighting from the sun and stars at night, especially those shot on earth. These scenes are few, only representing the scenes from New York where Odin was exiled.
Editing
Thor (Kenneth Branagh 2011)
* The film uses hard cuts where scenes are left hanging to engage the audience in thinking critically to fill the plot gap.
* Jump cuts are extensively used, sometimes going unnoticed by the audience, especially when switching from scenes shot on earth and those in other realms.
* Branagh does not use transitional effects to signal to the audience the difference between flashback scenes and the current story plot.
* Montage is excellently applied with successive shots telling a concrete story, although hard cuts affect the story flow in some areas.
* Extensive application of the kuleshov effect. For example, the camera focuses on the hammer and then jump cuts to Thor smiling at the hammer before trying to lift it.
* Extensive use of flashback scenes to fill gaps in the plot development, like how Odin lost...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Research Paper Samples: