Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
APA
Subject:
Business & Marketing
Type:
Research Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.37
Topic:

Religious Discrimination Case: Karma S., v. Dr. David J. Shulkin

Research Paper Instructions:

ISSUE
State the legal issue of the case.
RULE
State the rule that the court applies to the legal issue.
ANALYSIS
Discuss in detail how the court approached the case and how it came to its ruling. This should include a summary of the facts of the underlying dispute, an explanation of how case came to the court or regulatory agency, and a summary of any case law that the court included in the opinion.
CONCLUSION/APPLICATION
State a brief conclusion of the case. Discuss your opinion on whether the court came to the correct conclusion. Discuss how this case should be utilized in employment planning and policies to minimize employer liability.
My discussion Post....
The Case I found was Karma S. Vs. Dr. David J Shulkin, Department of Veterans Affairs Agency.
Karma worked as a registered nurse and nursing tour coordinator at the Agency's VA Medical Center in Fayetteville, North Carolina. October 2015 she filed an EEO complaint saying that the company discriminated against her on her disabilities as well as age and religious beliefs. From 2013 up until the lawsuit the chief nurse denied her requests for religious accommodations to not work on Wednesday nights, Saturdays and Sundays.
The courts' final decision concerning her equal employment opportunity complain alleging employment discrimination was amended because they found that she did not demonstrate that she was subjected to discrimination or denied accommodation.
With that being said I think the courts' decision was pretty fair because after all, she was a nurse, so I feel as though she knew the career path that she chose would require her work at all times and days.

Research Paper Sample Content Preview:
Religious Discrimination Case Student’s Name Institutional Affiliation CASE: Karma S., v. Dr. David J. Shulkin Issue As far as this case is concerned, the main bond of contention presented herein regards whether the FAD of the agency made an error in concluding that the complainant was not discriminated against nor distraught and had failed to reveal that she was deprived of a reasonable or otherwise religious accommodation. Rule For plaintiff to prevail, she ought to initially establish an apparent case of discrimination by presenting facts that, if inexplicable, sensibly give rise to an interpretation of discrimination. That is to say, a prohibited consideration was a factor in the adverse employment action. Therefore, the complainant and the prosecution have the burden of proof with regards to providing truthful evidence made against the defendant. In this case, the complainant and her team ought to have proven that the allegations set forth against the defendant were true for the court to rule in her favor. Analysis The plaintiff used to work as a registered nurse and nursing tour coordinator at the Agency's VA Medical Center in Fayetteville, North Carolina. On October 15, 2015 she made an EEO protest claiming that she had been discriminated against by the company based on her African-American origin, Jehovah’s Witness, religion, and her disability, which was due to insomnia and suffering from migraines. This is as far as the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Sec. 501, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 are concerned. The plaintif...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Research Paper Samples: