Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
1 Source
Style:
Chicago
Subject:
History
Type:
Reaction Paper
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.92
Topic:

State-Building Response Paper

Reaction Paper Instructions:

Reading: Gelvin, 205-219 Chapter 12: State-Building by Revolution and Conquest (In the attachment)
Important note on response papers: Demonstrating that you have read the material carefully, thoroughly, and thoughtfully enough to reconstruct its argument is the main point of the reading responses. There is no single right way to interpret an author’s argument, but there are ways to misrepresent an argument. You should take care to read the text they are responding to carefully and fully to avoid misrepresenting it.
Response papers on secondary sources (scholarly articles or book sections) should include the following components:
1. Identify a passage (which could be a sentence or a paragraph) from the reading that you think conveys one of the author’s main arguments. Quote this passage in your response, then explain in your own words what the argument is and/or why it matters.
2. Identify a passage that changed the way you think about a particular issue/event/theme and explain why.
3. Identify a passage that you either did not understand or agree with and explain why.

Reaction Paper Sample Content Preview:
State-Building Response Paper The first paragraph of the chapter outlines the author's main argument. In this paragraph, the authors show the efforts made by indigenous movements in establishing nations through conquest and revolution. The indigenous peoples aimed at conquering nations, not through war but through revolution. The League of Nations member states did not have the mandate to exercise their power beyond Mesopotamia and the Levant. "Outside that region, in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Anatolia, and Persia, indigenous nationalist movements and nation-builders established states through revolution, conquest, coup d'etat, and anti-imperialist struggle.” This is an introduction to the various leaderships developed in countries such as Turkey and Iran, as outlined later in the chapter. Such leadership played an important role in salvaging the damage done by foreign powers and leading their countries to economic independence. For instance, the governments no longer relied on foreign loans as they used to, indicating the success of a revolution. In this chapter, the author briefly mentions mass organizing and class consciousness. The author argues that different leaders like Mustafah and Rezah played a role in building the nation. Such was done by combining modernism and indigenous ways. Through the mass organization, class consciousness was brought to a focus on nationalism, along with the strongest urban middle-class elite from Islam. By doing so, these leaders created a new way of life for their countrymen.[Gelvin, James L. The modern Middle East: a history. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.]
One of the passages that changed how I think about modernization and the economy is how Mustafah and Rezah led the state economic intervention. This paragraph changed my view and understanding of the economic impact of World War I. The modernization funding in Iran and Turkey after World War 1 differed from the defense development years because the people no longer relied on money from raw materials, cash crops, foreign loans, and concessions. Before such initiatives wer...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to world war 1:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!