Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
Other
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 14.58
Topic:

Feedback on Peer Policy Brief

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

this order must be complete by my preferred writer. if he/she is not available at the moment. please wait for him and do not transfer it to another writer.
You will review two of your colleagues' policy/research briefs between April 5 and April 10, providing substantive feedback to help them improve their written products for this class. Reviewing others' work gives you the opportunity to see how other social work policy-practitioners communicate their ideas in writing.
This assignment is worth 20 points (10 points for each review completed). Your timely attention to this assignment is important because your colleagues have one week to make any adjustments to their final assignment. If your reviews are late, your peers have limited time in which to respond to your suggestions.
Hi this assignment will be writing feedback on two classmate's policy brief. each feedback is around 400 words. no reference needed. for grading rubric refer to the syllabus and the assignment description in order 00145431

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Feedback on Peer Policy Brief
Name
Department, Institution Affiliation
Course Code; Course Name
Instructor's Name
Date
Feedback on Peer Policy Brief
Peer Review 1:
The draft policy memo is appealing and meets the specific thresholds as stated in the instructions. However, separating the executive summary into two paragraphs is not appropriate. An executive summary addresses the whole draft policy, and it would be necessary to make it short, one paragraph, and covers all the ideas in the policy brief. Secondly, it is not appropriate to reference the executive summary since it provides the reader with key elements in the policy brief. Therefore, referencing it is not recommendable. Regardless of the structure, the executive summary is comprehensive and focuses on valid statistics such as the $50 billion used in the corrections and valid recidivism data. Secondly, in the second paragraph of the executive summary, line two, be specific on the states other than stating the word 'some states' to ensure clarity. A policy brief should be clear, and generalizations may leave the reader unanswered questions. An executive summary represents the whole policy brief, and making it effective would have a lot of impact on the policy outcome.
Secondly, the context and scope of the problem are comprehensive and have adequate valid data. It would allow the policymakers to understand the data sources and the key adjustments that can be considered to ensure the social issue is timely mitigated. The major aspect I would bring to your attention is the year of the study. Under the 'context and scope of the problem,’ it is noticeable that you have used an outdated study, the year 2007. Using such studies is not a big issue; however, complement it with recent studies such as 5 years old for the policymakers to understand the social problem's urgency and focus on updated interventions.
Additionally, using specific states such as Michigan and Oregon in the data visualization tool is reliable since they are examples of states with reduced recidivism due to effective policies. However, in your data visualization table, take note of your spelling; for instance, you have written 'recdivism' instead of recidivism. Lastly, the key area you have done a wonderful job is policy recommendation. The provided policy recommendations are valid since they align with Oregon and Michigan, which have adequately considered similar changes and received a positive outco...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These Other Other (Not Listed) Samples: