Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
5 pages/β‰ˆ1375 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Other (Not Listed)
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 24.3
Topic:

Stakeholder Scenario: Implementation Plan Health, Medicine Essay

Other (Not Listed) Instructions:

Read and complete “Stakeholder Scenario” resource

 

Stakeholder Scenario

 

Goal: To convince a group of people to use a specific, new type of antibiotic for patients pre-operatively in order to decrease surgical wound infections.

 

Scenario: You are a healthcare administrator that is trying to introduce a change in practice to a group of stakeholders. Your goal is to help them understand the rationale and need for the change, and to get a sense of the areas of resistance to the change. The change under discussion is to implement a new antibiotic to be given one hour before surgery starts as a way of reducing post-op wound infections. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Studies (CMS) have indicated that timely pre-op application of specific antibiotics is becoming a requirement and will be a publicly reported indicator on the CMS Web site for your hospital. Thus, institution of this new procedure is something you really need to pull off.

 

As the administrator in this scenario, you will hear the initial responses of each of the stakeholders. You will then be presented with several options for your response. Select the option you think is most effective.

 

Review the stakeholders’ responses to the option you selected. According to their own perspectives and prerogatives, the stakeholders will respond in different ways to each choice. Your goal is to achieve some level of buy-in to the change.

 

Issues:

  • The antibiotic is new and people aren’t familiar with it.
  • Requires administration within one hour of the actual surgery start time.
  • Requires administration by IV.
  • Adds a step to the busy pre-op nurse’s work load.
  • Saves the hospital $28,000 per year.
  • Research shows wound infections down 47% with this new antibiotic if it is administered in a timely fashion.

 

Players:

  • Pharmacist: He’s learned about the new antibiotic through his research studies, and is excited about using it.
  • Pre-op Nurse: She is worried about having one more thing added to the pre-op activities list she must complete before the patient goes to surgery, but she’s very interested in doing the right thing for her patients.
  • Surgeon: He hates government mandates, doesn’t like to be told what to do, generally has a pretty good track record for his patients’ outcomes after surgery, but has no idea what his actual rates of wound infection are.
  • Finance Analyst: It’s all about the money. Don’t make it harder by concentrating on anything other than the dollars.

 

Stakeholders’ Background Thinking

 

Pharmacist: I really like this idea, because this antibiotic is better and cheaper too. If we can standardize to this antibiotic, I can save money by stocking only one antibiotic for surgery. It will save my staff time in preparation also. This is a great idea for me and my department.

 

Pre-op Nurse: I am just worn out trying to keep up with all the changes they keep hitting us with. It’s hard enough to do my job and remember to do things differently and use different items. Why can’t they give me a break? Now I’ll have to start an IV as well as give a drug, and they are already pressuring me to get the patient ready for the OR faster. Sometimes I just want to go home!! But I got into nursing to help people, and if this really makes a difference, I guess I can suck it up.

 

Physician: The government makes me crazy! Those bureaucrats think they know how to practice medicine better than I do. The last thing I need is some ivory tower academic telling me what antibiotics to give! I’ve been doing this for 30 years, and I know what works and what doesn’t. The stupid hospital better shut up and let me do what I know is right and stop telling me how to be a doctor. My patients like me and that is what counts. I’m sure voting Libertarian in the next election!

 

Financial Analyst: I have been tasked to save this hospital hundreds of thousands of dollars this year, and this one change will save us a bundle. Why are they all arguing? This change could save their jobs! Don’t they get that it’s all about the money? I wish they’d just shut up and approve the change so we could go get lunch.

 

First Responses of Stakeholders

  • Pharmacist: “This is really important. All the research on this new antibiotic shows that it makes a big difference in reducing wound infections. We could get our rate from 13% presently down to 2%. We need to do this.”
  • Pre-op Nurse: “This is going to take much more time. We’ve always been able to give our patients pill antibiotics, and now you want me to have to start an IV and administer the drug that way? What happens if I give it and the surgery is delayed? There is already so much I have to do to get the patient to the OR.”
  • Surgeon: “What a bunch of horse hockey! I’ve been using the same antibiotic for 25 years and its fine. No need to make silly changes just to keep the government happy. What do they know about medicine anyway? All they want to do is make us follow some stupid ‘cookbook’ and it’s ridiculous. They should just leave all that up to the doctor.”
  • Finance Analyst: “It saves money. Just do it.”

 

Administrator’s Response Options

Select one:

1)      “Well, we have to do this because it’s a government requirement.”

2)      “You all raise valid points of concern. The evidence shows a significant benefit to our patient care.”

3)      “What could be done in the implementation that would relieve some of your worries?”

 

Responses to Option 1

Pharmacist: “We can make this switch as soon as you are ready.”

Pre-Op Nurse: “We’ll have to tell the patient to come in four hours before the surgery to do this. What a pain.”

Surgeon: “The heck with this. You can’t make me do it.”

Finance Analyst: “It saves money. Just do it.”

 

Responses to Option 2

Pharmacist: “There is a real benefit. Surgical site infections drop like crazy. It’s the right thing to do.”

Pre-op Nurse: “I want to do the right thing. If Pharmacy can get the drugs up to the unit in the morning, maybe I can start the IVs faster.”

Surgeon: “I’m all about patient care, but why can’t I use what I’ve always used?”

Financial Analyst: “It saves money. Just do it.”

 

Responses to Option 3

Pharmacist: “It would help me to know how many drug doses to stock in the OR each morning so I can make sure they have what they need on hand.”

Pre-op Nurse: “That would sure help me. We can begin by having the IVs pre-prepared so we just have to put the needle in the patient.”

Surgeon: “Can I see the data about wound infections? How do I stack up against other surgeons?”

Financial Analyst: “Great, you all see it. It saves money. Let’s do it.”

 

Assignment

As is usually the case, it is possible to achieve some measures of acceptance of changes. The way you respond will affect your ability to do this. However, in real life, it rarely happens this quickly.

 

When involved in negotiations, key elements to remember include:

  • Pay close attention to the reasons people give for their resistance. You will gain a better insight into their thought processes and can tailor your responses to their perspectives.
  • You may have to ask questions several times to dig into the real reasons why people may oppose something. The opposition sometimes can be driven by fears and anxieties, but those are not usually expressed initially. However, if you keep asking questions and listening carefully, they will begin to emerge.
  • Once you have a sense of the perspectives of the various stakeholders about the change, you can begin to address them and use them to overcome any objections to the change.
  • Sometimes the best you can get in the initial conversations is a willingness to move away from “I’m not gonna.” to “Let me see the data.” That’s a big step toward willingness.

 

Based on this initial scenario, develop an implementation plan. It should include:

  • The administrator’s initial statement of what is being implemented and why.
  • (Review the stakeholder’s background thinking and first responses.) The administrator’s (your) response option choice.
  • How to communicate with the stakeholders (especially if they need further convincing).
  • What evaluation criteria are needed?
  • Time frames.
  • Other items you think would be valuable to include.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other (Not Listed) Sample Content Preview:

Stakeholder Scenario: Implementation Plan
Student’s Name
Institution
Stakeholder Scenario: Implementation Plan
Often, there is a lot of evidence-based research that needs to be translated into practice. This necessitates a successful implementation plan that ensures the adoption of research and facilitates change. In healthcare, a successful implementation is a difference between improved quality of patient care and mediocre patient care. As Rapport, Clay-Williams, Churruca, Shih, Hogden, and Braithwaite (2018) posit, a successful implementation optimizes patient care and improves healthcare professional practice across all healthcare levels. This paper aims to develop an implementation plan that convinces certain stakeholders in the hospital to start using a new drug.
Initial Statement
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Studies (CMS) reveals that timely pre-operative application of certain antibiotics is a requirement that will soon become a publicly reported indicator for hospitals. It will be reported on the CMS website and our hospital will be affected by this change. In line with this mandate, the hospital wants to introduce a new antibiotic that will be administered by IV one hour before surgery as a strategy of reducing infections of post-operative wounds. Other than being a government requirement, this change has a great impact on improving post-surgery patient outcomes. Research indicates that if this new drug is administered on time, post-operative wound infections will reduce by 47%. This evidence is also in line with the checkpoints developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) (2018), which involves the timely administration of antibiotics before surgery to prevent surgical site infections.
Response Options
The main stakeholders, that is, the pharmacist, the pre-operative nurse, the surgeon, and the financial analyst, have made very important points regarding this change. Each point needs to be addressed if the new drug is to be successfully implemented and adopted in the hospital. For instance, the additional workload on the nurse is a serious issue and there is a need to establish how the change can be made easier on the nurse, as well as on other stakeholders. Thus, the most effective option would be the third response. Response 3 asks the stakeholders what they think can be done during the implementation process to address some of their concerns. This response ensures that all stakeholders are fully involved in the decision-making, rather than being forced to adopt change due to the government’s mandate. Therefore, they will contribute to the solutions and their participation in the implementation will be voluntary. Stakeholder engagement is usually the first step towards a successful implementation process. For instance, when well engaged, stakeholders can brainstorm to identify the possible barriers and strategies that can be adopted in the implementation (Powell, et al., 2015). It will also give them ownership of the proposed change. Stakeholder engagement has to be approached with the right communication strategy.
Goals and Objectives
The primary main goal of the new drug is to reduce the rate of post-operative infections for patients in our hospitals. The secondary ...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Other (Not Listed) Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!