Twelve Angry Men: Different Personalities Are Placed In A Group (Movie Review Sample)
Read the chapter on Groups & Leaders and any additional class notes that have been provided on Blackboard, taking special note of theories of group development and leadership, roles that are played in groups, how groups reach decisions.
Watch the film Twelve Angry Men (1957 version) available on You Tube.
Use the guidelines provided, write an analysis of the group dynamics portrayed in the film. Use specific examples, names of the characters and any other information you find relevant. Should be a minimum of three pages.
Some extra guidelines for your paper are listed below!
Communication Patterns-What communication patterns did you observe about the group you are analyzing.
Cohesiveness- How cohesive was the group? Did the group's level of cohesiveness affect how its members communicated?
Conflict- Did any conflicts arise among the group? If so, how were the conflicts handled.
Role Playing-What roles did various group members play? Did a leader emerge? If so, what is his or leadership style? If not, who or what guided the group's actions.
We will review the guidelines for the paper in class on Monday.
First and last name
12 Angry Men
Group dynamics deals with groups' functioning and structures and the different roles played by each of the characters. In the “12 Angry Men (1957),” group dynamics are depicted through jury deliberations. In this classic movie, a group of twelve men is given the opportunity to decide if a young man is guilty of murdering his father. There is conflicting personality as the functioning and efforts of the minds jointly as they search to get to the bottom of the issue or truth we see several group dynamics' characteristics at work. We can see the entire human spectrum as represented here from analysis of the juries. The group in nature influenced the outcome regardless of what they brought to the judgment.
When different personalities are placed in a group, there is a need to communicate effectively and work as a team. Sometimes you will find yourself stuck as an individual because of various barriers including inadequate of communication among members. Nevertheless, as a group, all the members are obliged to find the ability to do so as a unit. In the video, we come across 12 jurors who decided whether the young man is guilty of the murder or is presumed innocent in a capital murder trial. From our side as the audience, it is challenging for each of the juries to give a verdict backed by true consensus in the presence of different roles, personalities as well as negotiation strategies (Waller, Sohrab, and Ma, 446). Among the 12 jurors, six of them explicitly influenced the trial hence establishing informal roles. Characters at some extent played more than a single explicit role, including informal roles such as Information-seeker, Initiator-contributor, Opinion-seeker, Clarifier-Elaborator, Information-giver, Facilitator, Coordinator, Stage-hog, Fighter controller, Cynic, and Blocker.
Juror number 1 is Foreman who does not understand the complexity of the task before him while j
- Movie Analysis Assignment Paper: Psycho (The USA, 1960)Description: For our purposes, the film is a rich resource for examining how cinematography, editing, acting, and sound contribute to the narrative....1 page/≈275 words | No Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Movie Review |
- Review Of Logan (2017): The Story Behind The MovieDescription: First of all, the story behind the movie, written by Mangold, Scott Frank, and Michael Green, resonates with what people often go through...3 pages/≈825 words | 3 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Movie Review |
- The Social Network: Character RelationshipDescription: The Social Network: Character Relationship - Movie Review. lawsuits of facebook founders...2 pages/≈550 words | 3 Sources | APA | Literature & Language | Movie Review |