Doctrine Double Effect (Literature & Language Essay)
a) Explain principle C, including any important concepts it appeals to.
b) Consider Fat Man and Drug. Briefly explain each case (this can be very brief, just so I know you understand the cases). For each of these two cases, explain whether principle C permits you to save the five in that case. Make sure to fully explain why you think the principle yields the judgment it does in these two cases.
c) Critically examine principle C. At least present an objection to it, even if you end up supporting the principle. I am looking for critical thinking here. Superficial comments for this part will not earn you an A on the exam, even if you ace all the prior parts.
Instructions for submission:
- You must write the exam in a Microsoft Word document and upload the document (it must be in .doc or .docx format)
- You must name the Word document first name last name midterm 1.doc (or docx) For example, "Bach Ho midterm 1.doc"
- You must include your first and last name inside the document on the top right
- Paste the exam question into your Word document and then answer each lettered part underneath that lettered part. So it will look like:
a) the exam question
your answer
b) the exam question
your answer
etc.
Doctrine Double Effect
Name:
Course
Instructor
Date:
a) Explain principle C, including any important concepts it appeals to.
Principle C (doctrine of double effect) highlights that it is not morally permissible to kill someone intentionally, but then it is permissible to kill as a side-effect. There are two possible outcomes one good and one bad. The principle supposes that an action that causes a bad effect can be morally acceptable as long as a proportional good effect result from the action. Evil should not be intentional and the bad outcome should not be a means to good, the action is not intrinsically bad there is focus on the good outcome. The pursuit of a good may result in an inevitable evil, but the action must be good, intention must be good, and the good must prevail.
b) Consider Fat Man and Drug. Briefly explain each case (this can be very brief, just so I know you understand the cases). For each of these two cases, explain whether principle C permits you to save the five in that case. Make sure to fully explain why you think the principle yields the judgment it does in these two cases.
In Fat Man scenario there is a trolley that can potentially kill five people. This time one is on a bridge and the brakes of the trolley have failed and the way to stop it is to throw something that obstructs it. You are standing next to a fat man and if I were to push him towards the track he would stop the trolley and die, but then save five people. T...
You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to kill a mockingbird:
- Was World War II a Good War? History Essay Research1 page/≈275 words | MLA | History | Essay |
- Historical Fiction History Research Paper Coursework6 pages/≈1650 words | APA | History | Research Paper |
- Antibiotics Use and Gut Microflora1 page/≈275 words | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Antibiotics. Health, Medicine, Nursing Assignment.2 pages/≈550 words | APA | Health, Medicine, Nursing | Essay |
- Wk 3 - Themes in Shakespeare’s Tragedies - Madness versus sanity3 pages/≈825 words | APA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Wk 3 Discussion - The Tragedies. Madness versus Insanity1 page/≈275 words | MLA | Literature & Language | Essay |
- Macbeth Essay. William Shakespeare. Literature & Language Essay2 pages/≈550 words | Other | Literature & Language | Essay |