Turing Test Social Sciences Essay Research Coursework

Student's Name:
Professor's Name:
Course:
Date:
Turing Test
The critics of the Turing Test have argued that there is no way the AI can produce accurate results, making it difficult for its further development (Norris 2). There are also claims that the test is harmful to science as others support that it is essential to science. The experiment examined the intellectual abilities of machines compared to humans. For Turing, making a machine to reason would help us understand how humans to reason. The results of the Turing faced contention on the grounds of how satisfactory the conversation between the computer and the two respondents, one human and the other a computer were. From the multiple tests conducted in 2008 and 2012, it can be deduced that since thinking is depicted by certain behavior which computers exhibit, then in like manner, computers think. However, this analogy of thinking as a behavior might not be adequate to explain if computers think because this behavior is likely to be emulated easily.
The Turing test proposed that every computer has an artificial intelligence when subjected to certain conditions to give certain responses as a man. The test had three terminals where one was separated physically and run by the machine, while the other two were run by humans (Castro 2). During the test, the first humans would do the questioning while the second human and the computer responded. After some duration, and with the questions posed to these two, the questioner determined which of the two was human and the machine (Castro 2). After several tests, then the computer will be regarded as a human same as the human respondent.
Turing, in his 1950 paper, predicted a different future for computers in some years to come. This would mean that the question of 'Can machines think?' would soon be termed irrelevant (Warwick 990). It was easy to deduce that it would be a possible program since the 'about fifty years' is not in any way meant to mean 'exactly fifty years.' By the 2000s, for instance, people talked of machines as thinkers and learned without anybody branding them as irrelevant or contradictory. Compared to the time when Turing first talked about 'machine intelligence,' the topic is no longer a force to reckon with. One theoretical claim explained that there was no way machines would disguise themselves as having intelligence for too long if they were not intelligent: there was some good chance the computer was intelligent. Turing’s other claim was based on the fact that a computer could pass the test as in the first case depending on how well its manufacturer made it. However, most criticism was channeled to the second claim than to the first claim as it was argued that there was no way a computer would pass the test without having the actual knowledge that humans have.
The most prevalent the machine passes the test was when it convinced the jury fully through its response when quizzed. This was achieved with the help of a jury, of about twelve who were not acquainted with matters to do with machines. The Turing test had a machine that disguised itself as human and other controversial abilities. While at it, Turing knew that this game would face criticism due to the several odds in the machine. The r...