Irregular Warfare: Great Power Competition

Student Name
Instructor
Course Code
Date
Irregular Warfare: Great Power Competition
Irregular warfare in the context of insurgent powers and Great Power Competition has fundamental differences as mechanized by the modern era of warfare. They differ in that the intensity of the conflict is unmentioned in the setting of counterinsurgency. Seemingly, the great-power conflict is limited by the proxy wars that are inevitably civil rivalries between powers such as the United States, Russia, and China. On the other hand, an insurgency is defined by messy little wars that flung different corners of the world, such as Afghanistan and Iraq. According to political and economic commentators, an insurgency is a problem that is adopted by Chinese elites, well funded and strategically sophisticated, to prioritize interstate terrorism over citizenship interests. This paper analyzes the fundamental differences between insurgency and great power competition using modern warfare.
The major distinction between the great power conflict and competition is unconventional and traditional is the clash of interests between proxy warfare nations such as China and the United States. According to 21st-century insurgent components, insurgent conflicts are dictated by low-intensity conflicts that serve as a military footprint in great power competitors against other small nations (Metz, 13). After the Cold War conclusion, the concept was used by defense personnel, military leaders, and policymakers. It led to the ‘new world order challenges and sole challenge to the great power competitors. On the other hand, great power competition incorporates superpower nations such as Russia, China, and the U.S., which have influenced little irregular wars in other corners of the world such as Somalia, Haiti, Kosovo, and Bosnia. In insurgent warfare, the military adheres to peacekeeping doctrines and aspects as dictated by warfare conferences and proliferated seminars. Handful scholars have identified insurgency as an affiliation adopted by small nations and groups such as Al Qaeda. They are different from great power competitors since they involve extreme violent riots coordinated by a particular group or religion. Great power competition involves military scrambling and high-intensity maneuvers which is a far pale comparison to counter-insurgent entanglements.
To borrow concepts from defense lessons, great power wars are enemies to political and economic courses of action since they rely on the capability of a certain nation. For instance, in the United States, great power wars involve Marines and Soldiers, which ultimately connote nuclear annihilation and unimagined destructive actions. The emergence of modern technology and ubiquitous surveillance efforts have made the great power conflict enhanced. Conventional weapons trigger mutual economic destruction and unwanted infantry divisions in this context. Most of the great power giants are engrossed in saying that “the best to prevent warfare is being prepared to win it.” On the other side, insurgent warfare does not include massive investments in weaponry domains sinc...