Ethical Theory: Argument For and Against Utilitarianism Theory

Name
Institution
Course
Professor
Date
Utilitarianism Theory Analysis
Utilitarianism theory judges an action to determine whether it is right or wrong depending on the outcome. This theory believes that the right action to take any time one is in a dilemma that benefits or brings happiness to more people. I find consequentialist theories more accommodating, allowing one to choose the best cause of action to benefit most people. Acts of utilitarianism can be understood well through everyday examples. Suppose a music entertainer has promised a concert to his fans and every necessary preparation is made for the day, including buying of tickets by the fans. One day prior to the concert, the musician realizes they might not make it for the concert due to an urgent call by his daughter to accompany her on the set day for a basketball tournament where she would be participating. As a father who adores her daughter, he feels obliged to be at the tournament. According to utilitarianism theory, going to the concert will benefit more people at the expense of his daughter, whom his decision may hurt. By utilitarianism rule, the musician should go to the concert and forgo the basketball tournament where his daughter is playing.
Argument for Utilitarianism
One of the ideas behind utilitarianism theory is its neutrality. Being neutral means that the cause of action is not imposed on anyone, as it gives room for deciding the best action depending on how it benefits other people. The concept of utilitarianism is unlike deontology’s cause of action, which is pre-determined through set rules. Utilitarianism gives room for one to reason and apply logic in decision-making. Since utilitarianism theory is based on the outcome of an action, one should use logic and think before taking an action. The theory assumes if an action brings happiness to people, it’s worth taking regardless of the morality of the action. Utilitarianism values justice. Justice does not give room to