Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
MLA
Subject:
Life Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 11.88
Topic:

Sartre vs. Nietzsche

Essay Instructions:

Please pick one of the following topics to write on. Please focus on the writings we used, and not their other writings or their personal lives. You may also develop your own paper topic, but must get my approval in advance.
Compare and contrast Marx and Nietzsche. Focus on the role of history in their work: the past history of an enslaved/oppressed group overcoming a ruling group, and how this history has shaped present-day ethics or present-day classes. According to each, what forces drive history, and where do they think history is going?
Compare and contrast Nietzsche’s and Sartre’s views on ethics. Topics to consider include their critique of conventional morality and religion, their conceptions of freedom/spontaneity, their conceptions of the self/substances/essences, and the role of creativity in the ethical sphere.
Explain the basic position that Sartre takes, and then show how either Beauvoir or Fanon applies this analysis to the situation of women or blacks.
Explain the basic position that Marx takes, and then show how either Beauvoir or Fanon applies this analysis to the situation of women or blacks.
Compare and contrast Beauvoir and Fanon. You should devote some attention to their basic philosophical position, but you should also consider the ways in which the situations of women and blacks are similar, and the what ways in which they are different.
Format: Name on first page only in top left. 12-point Times New Roman double-spaced, 1-inch margins all around. The reason for this is that I blind-grade the papers.
Grading criteria:
• Accuracy and detail of content on each philosopher. You may use direct quotes, but for the most part, you should put their ideas in your own words.
• Perceptiveness of the comparison.
• Spelling and grammar.
• Organization: The paper as a whole should have a topic sentence, each paragraph should have a topic sentence for that paragraph, and the paper should be organized into paragraphs which cover similar material.
Papers must be a minimum of 750 words long. Try to devote roughly equal amounts of space to each philosopher. You do not need to use secondary sources, but if you do, you must use some standard citation method, such as MLA, APA, or Chicago. For this class only, you do not need to cite the primary texts assigned in class: I will be able to tell where you are getting the material. Papers are due 5/8 at 11:59 p.m. Philadelphia time. Late papers will be penalized a grade a day.

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Student's Name
Professor's Name
Course
Date
Sartre vs. Nietzsche
Friedrich Nietzsche and Jean-Paul Sartre are two famous atheists with so many things in common that make it difficult to note the differences. The topics that make them so similar such as morality, religion, and freedom, also bring out the lack of harmony in their work. Some of the notable similarities in their work are the concept of free will because they refute the existence of God. They both champion self-consciousness and self- creations to the level that we need. However, the two schools of thought start at the same point but tend to diverge when it comes to the evidence put forward. The essay seeks to evaluate the differences between Nietzsche and Sartre's opinions on morality, religion, and freedom.
On religion, Nietzsche is more pessimistic than Sartre is about the ideas of God and Christianity. It means that Nietzsche was a fiercer critic of Christianity that his counterpart. He introduces the idea that God is dead in his works, "The Gay Science", showing that he made man free of the concept of God (Nietzsche). He rejected the ideologies that Christianity presented but did acknowledge the implications of the lack of it. As Sartre merely dismisses the existence of God, his counterpart does and in-depth discussion. For a student going through both their works, Nietzsche can convince them of the non-existence of God and Christianity altogether. He is radical, using words like "Fuck everything" and other nasty ones. Nietzsche also claims that we are born in a world that is not of our making, and we should free ourselves from it. He historically viewed as a passionate atheist following in the pessimist footsteps of Schopenhauer. Sat gives a dissatisfying view about the existence of God and narrowly provides evidence for his atheism. As proclaimed by Bertrand Russell, we view Sartre's as 'Not enough evidence, God! Not enough evidence' thus, he does not create a strong atheism position. Nietzsche was a strong thinker and proclaimer of the non-existence of God. He has independent thoughts, while Sartre seems to draw his philosophy from the acknowledgment of the existence of God.
Although Sartre and Nietzsche hold the same views on morality, their ideas, and thinking differently, the idea that God died continues to confuse many until today, thus the rise of the question of ethics. Morality, according to Nietzsche, has a basis on Christianity because all codes are religious. Martone states that Nietzsche views morality as something you earn after reaching a certain level of superiority while Sartre sees it achievable when the whole humanity takes part in the creation of those moral codes (Martone, 4). Nietzsche viewed that the concept of morality co...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These MLA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!