Review of Secondary Sources (Literature & Language Essay)

Aiqi Wu
INTS Seminar
Professor Markle
Review of Secondary Sources
Debata, Ranjan, & Tian, Guang. “A cultural rights approach vs. nationalist mobilization: An applied anthropological case study of the Uyghur diaspora community.” Practicing Anthropology, 33, no. 4 (2011), 35-38.
Debata, M. R., & Tian, R. G. (2011). A cultural rights approach vs. nationalist mobilization: An applied anthropological case study of the Uyghur diaspora community. Practicing Anthropology, 33(4), 35-38.
Thesis statement
Debata and Tian (2010) have used the article to discuss the political activities of a population of Uyghur migrants in the United States and the appropriate approach that such a population should exploit to gain their independence amicably from the People’s Republic of China. The article embeds the discussion on the viability of either nationalist mobilization or a cultural rights approach to arrive at the targeted solutions.
The Topic
The topic of this publication peer-reviewed article is “A cultural rights approach vs. nationalist mobilization: An applied anthropological case study of the Uyghur diaspora community”. Debata and Tian (2010) have driven the topic from the activities of Uyghur migrants who live in the US. Debata and Tian’s article discusses the political activities of a population of Uyghur migrants in the United States and the appropriate approach that such a population should exploit to gain their independence amicably from the People’s Republic of China. The article embedsdelves into the discussion on the viability of either nationalist mobilization or a cultural rights approach to arrive at the targeted solutions socio-political solutions by the Uyghurs. The authors argue that the number of Uyghur political organizations have increased in the past due to a lack of unified political ideologies. At the same time, the Chinese government has consistently accused members of the Uyghur community living overseas of terrorist activities. More notable is the fact that members of the Uyghur who live overseas have failed to form a singular strategy to explore their political course.
How the Authors Support their Argument
The authors also argue that members of the Uyghur community in the US are pursuing the right political course through the wrong strategies. They support this argument by analyzing the multiple Uyghur political organizations that exist in the US. Each of the organizations is assessed based on its structure and political approach. The conclusions are stemmed from the analyses.
Structuring the Argument
The authors have structured the argument in such a manner that it depicts both sides of the divide. The inputs are developmental. That is, the authors describe the topic from causes to impacts. The article is subdivided into subtopics that explore elements of the main purpose of the study. The researchers have also included primary inputs from the targeted populations that enhance the quality of their argument.
Understanding the Subject
Debata and Tian (2010) have employed an approach that eases the understanding of their assertions. Reading this article eases the understanding of disagreements between China and Uyghur people. This artic...