Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Social Sciences
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.32
Topic:

Moral Reasoning

Essay Instructions:
our assignment this week, we will be looking at the complexities of moral reasoning. To begin, complete the interactive experiment, based on the famous Trolley Dilemma, from Philosophyexperiments.com (linked below). Be sure to keep a record of your answers as you work through the questions, and then read the analyses of your answers at the end of the experiment. Note: The final page of this activity is titled: “Is it Because He's Fat: A Piece of Bigotry” – you do not need to continue beyond that page. http://www(dot)philosophyexperiments(dot)com/fatman/Default.aspx For your essay this week, discuss what you learned about your own moral reasoning compared with the moral reasoning of others who participated in this experiment (this will be available to you in the analysis section). The following questions should help guide your writing: In the preliminary questions, what answers did you select and why did you select them? In the scenario questions, (The Runaway Train, The Fat Man on the Bridge, The Saboteur, and The Fat Man and the Ticking Bomb), what answers did you select and why did you select them? In the analysis section, were your preliminary answers and your scenario answers consistent? If not, why not? How do your answers compare with the answers of others who also participated in this experiment? What does this experiment tell you about yourself and others in terms of moral reasoning?
Essay Sample Content Preview:
MORAL REASONING Name: Institutional Affiliation My Moral Reasoning Compared With the Moral Reasoning of Others As determined in the case of The Fat Man and the Trickling Bomb and the Saboteur, I primarily choose on allowing the fat man to be tortured in order to reveal the location of the bomb before detonating and killing a million people (Krcmar, & Cingel, 2016). According to my view, I selected these answers since it is always wrong to cause a death or inflict pain on an individual's life. However, in some instances where the lives of several people are dependent on a single life, and has the capacity to maximize the happiness of several people, then these aspects may be justified. According to the preliminary answers to the case provided, my answers were not consistent since my moral choices and reasoning's are applied and governed by a small set of moral principles. The findings of the scenario indicate that my moral judgments are made on intuitions in making judgments to maximize a population's happiness that is not justified. It is considerably essentia...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

👀 Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!