ICC's Formation on Neoliberalism and the Realism and Liberalism Theories

Theories of International Relations
Name:
Institution:
Theories of International Relation
Introduction
The two major theories of international relations are liberalism and realism. Liberalism theory advocates for establishing interstate cooperation through which are more vital institutions can be erected to help nations sort out various problems that cannot be resolved on the archaic system. On the other hand, the realism theory of international relations is based on establishing a more vital state that can brush off any threat from the external community. This paper evaluates ICC's formation concerning whether the acts signify neoliberalism's support or falsification. The paper also compares realism and liberalism theories with regards to cooperation.
Part I: Perspective of Formation of ICC on Neoliberalism
Several experts see liberalism or neoliberalism as a strategy through which the international community can resolve issues in a holistic, diplomatic, and through consensus where a win-win solution is reached among the conflicting parties. To succeed in their quest, proponents of neoliberalism believe in solid international institutions' information. One such institution is the International Criminal Court (ICC). However, critics of neoliberalism have questioned whether the ICC's formation promotes or falsify neoliberalism. The answer to this question is that the ICC's construction supports and manufactures neoliberalism in equal measures. This is because as it provides a level ground for its member states to resolve their differences, within it exist elements of realism that outsiders can observe.
It is convincible to argue that the process through which the ICC was established indicates its support towards neoliberalism. Its formation resulted from consensus among different members of the global community who attended the global conference in Rome in 1998. Even after the inception of the ICC idea from the International Law Statute, delegates from the worldwide community continued to disagree to agree with each other in the spirit of neoliberalism until they finally managed to get the final draft. This factor shows a vital element of cooperation between members of the international community, who, despite having different views about the court's construction, still supported its establishment.
Secondly, in the spirit of neoliberalism, several member states, even with contradicting views on how cases at the ICC should be initiated, have remained in the ICC's support. A perfect example is China and the United States. Despite having a contrary opinion to the dictates of the Rome Statute and even went ahead to vote against it, they did not pull out their support of the ICC. The United Kingdom, on the other hand, decided to relinquish its position as a permanent member of the security council as well as its position in the like-minded group as a way of disagreeing with Singapore recommendation on allowing the security council to delay investigation in case of having unanimous support from the board. Despite these differences and defections, all the member states never engaged in any war, which could have been the case with realism.
On the contrary, observing the activities among members who support the ICC, ...