Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/≈550 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
APA
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 8.64
Topic:

Reflection in the Article: Casting Crowds in A Relational Perspective

Essay Instructions:

First, what does the author mean when he compares crowds as caricatures? Give an example of the caricature of one crowd you belonged to or existed in your high school.
Explain the concept of social distance as a proximity measure among crowds and how it relates to issues of permeability across crowds. Do you agree with the authors’ explanations? Provide support with an example from your high school experience.
What happens to the overall structure of crowds as we move from middle school, to early high school, to later high school? Draw a diagram similar to the authors (Figure 8.2.1) based on your secondary education experiences (i.e. middle school, junior high, early high school, late high school).
Based on the information reported in the study on desirability of peer crowds, did the results follow the expectations according to the standard peer status hierarchies? If not, what did they actually find? How desirable did you find your own crowd(s) in high school? Were you satisfied with your crowd affiliation or did you wish to be part of a different crowd? If so, which one and why?
What are some of the interesting results noted from the study conducted on the romantic relationships among crowds? What are a couple conclusions we can draw about romantic relationships among crowds, based on the data in table 8.2.2?

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Casting Crowds in A Relational Perspective
(Student’s Name)
(Affiliated Institution)
(Course)
(Date)
Casting Crowds in A Relational Perspective
In the article "casting crowds in a relational perspective: caricature, channel, and context," the author compares crowds as caricatures. By this, crowds are large groups of similarly stereotyped individuals that are reputation-based but lack individuality. The crowds are not "real" but are rather social constructions. Just like caricatures provide an exaggerated social niche and locate their members within its social structure, members of a crowd are socially connected by shared image and reputation than actual interaction. They only provide prescriptive identity to the members. There existed various crowds in my high school: the populars, the normals, the band geeks, the outcasts, and the academics. I identified with the populars and shared their values during my high school life.
Social distance refers to how close members of a crowd or different cross crowds are and their likelihood of forging friendships. Individuals within the same crowd can easily develop close ties and forge friendships. Some individuals can identify with more than one crowd, and as such, they are easily accepted by members of a proximal crowd. Groups whose values do not conflict much have their members easily forging friendships, while those whose values antagonize each other become alienated. Therefore, the likelihood of forging relationships among members of the proximal or same group is dictated by social distance and not physical distance. Being that crowds are ar...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to high school:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!