Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
4 pages/β‰ˆ1100 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Management
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 17.28
Topic:

The Different Kind of Biases

Essay Instructions:

Read through the scenarios below and think about what kind of biases are demonstrated in each scenario. For each scenario, carefully explain which specific bias or biases is demonstrated by the decision and what can be done to avoid this bias in the future. Make sure to pick at least one specific bias, and explain your reasoning. Your paper should be 4–5 pages in length:
1. The Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of a corporation is of the strong belief that marketing is not a good use of the company’s money. Someone shows her data from several years ago showing that during a period of high spending on marketing, sales did not go up. She says, “See, I told you marketing is not a good use of our budget!” and cuts the marketing budget to almost zero. Following the cut in the marketing budget, sales also start to drop dramatically. When asked by an employee if the drop in sales is due to the cut in the marketing budget, she says, “No!” and insists there must be a different explanation. What kind of decision-making bias do you think this represents, and why? What steps would you recommend to this CEO to reduce this kind of bias? Support your answer with references to at least one of the three background readings.
2. A CEO decides that he wants to greatly expand the company’s market by purchasing a major rival. This acquisition would double the company’s market share. However, several of his top managers warn him that such a purchase would require the company to take out a huge amount of debt to finance this merger, and that many of these large mergers have failed. They also point out that the organizational culture of the other company is very different and that managing this merger would be very difficult. Nonetheless, the CEO insists that he can overcome the odds and plans to go through with the merger. What kind of decision-making bias do you think this represents, and why? What steps should this leader take to avoid this bias? Support your answer with references to at least one of the three background readings.
3. A CEO wants to purchase a new factory. He is currently deciding between two factories. The owner of Factory A brags that 94% of products produced at the factory are free of defects. The owner of Factory B cautions that his factory has a 5% defect rate but management and staff are working very hard to reduce the rate. The CEO decides to purchase Factory A citing its strong 94% rate of success in producing defect-free products even though Factory B actually has a 95% rate of success. What kind of decision-making bias do you think this represents, and why? What steps should this leader take to avoid this bias?
4. A CEO of an automobile company decides to introduce a new hybrid vehicle using cutting-edge technology. A huge amount of money is spent in research and development as well as advertising. But when the car is completed sales are very slow and the price has to be cut so low that the company is losing money on every hybrid vehicle sold. She is advised to simply abandon the car to avoid further losses in profits, and focus her energy on selling profitable vehicles. However, she insists it is unwise to abandon the hybrid vehicle given that so much money has already been put into the project. What kind of decision-making bias do you think this represents, and why? What steps should this leader take to avoid this bias? Support your answer with references to at least one of the three background readings.
5. Conclude the paper with a discussion about which one of the decision-making biases you think is the most dangerous to a leader, and explain your reasoning.

Essay Sample Content Preview:
The Different Kind of Biases
Scenario 1
In this case, the corporation's chief financial officer most likely has a false causality bias. This kind of bias occurs when the decision-maker cites sequential events while emphasizing that one event caused the other. The bias involves using the results of one event as evidence that it caused the other (Abubakar et al., 2019). In this scenario, the chief financial officer is arguing that investing in marketing does not favor sales. She is using data from a past event where high spending on marketing did not significantly contribute to sales. Utilizing this event as evidence, she projects that marketing is not a good use for the corporation's budget. When the sales subsequently decline, she insists that the drop is not due to the low spending on marketing and that there must be another explanation. Most likely, the low spending on marketing led to low sales. Due to false causality bias, the chief financial officer may use two mutually exclusive evens to make a decision due to false causality bias. To reduce this kind of bias, I would recommend that the chief financial officer consider all the factors that contribute to sales. One of the factors that favor an increase in sales is spending on marketing (Kourdi, 2011). Therefore, there could be other factors that led to a decrease in sales in the previous event. In fact, it is very unlikely that high spending on marketing would result in low sales. There must be other factors.
Scenario 2
In this scenario, the CEO is demonstrating overconfidence bias. Overconfidence bias involves being overly sure that certain things will happen (Bolland & Fletcher, 2016). He is so confident that a merger will double the company’s market share that he ignores the other underlying factors. While mergers are intended to increase a company’s market share and revenue, key factors must be considered before an acquisition can happen (Mahrinasari et al., 2021). The CEO could engage in self-defeating mechanisms if the factors suggested by his top managers are anything to go by. The CEO is only looking at one side of the story and ignoring the other relevant factors. He is most likely having an overconfidence bias.
The following are the steps that this leader should take to avoid this bias. First, it seems that the CEO has dramatically focused on success stories regarding mergers. It might be important for the CEO to also do some research on failed mergers and identify the reasons why those mergers failed. He may realize that some of the reasons are similar to those suggested by his top managers. Secondly, instead of insisting that they will overcome the hurdles, the CEO should focus on the hurdles they are likely to face and identify a plan to overcome them. After a thorough analysis, if the hurdles can be overcome without hurting the business, then the merger idea can be executed. Otherwise, the merger idea should be kept at bay.
Scenario 3
The CEO is most likely being affected by framing bias. In this kind of decision-making bias, one focuses on the manner in which the information is presented rather than the information itself (Bennett, 2014). The owner of factory A employs a bragging tone while saying his factory has a 94% success rate....
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples: