Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
6 pages/≈1650 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Level:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 21.6
Topic:

Evidence presentation (Essay Sample)

Instructions:
PLEASE USE ATTACHED COURSE NOTES The purpose of this assignment is to apply what you have learned about how to prepare for and conduct an interview/interrogation. The effort put into preparation prior to conducting an interview/interrogation, as well as the approach and techniques used to conduct the actual interview are both critical elements that influence the success and effectiveness of the activity. This assignment has three parts: Part 1: Preparing for an interview/interrogation Part 2: Performing and effective interview/interrogation Part 3: Practice exercise and post mortem reflection For Part 1 and Part 2 of this assignment you will need to describe and explain the factors that lead to an effective interview/interrogation including preparation, logistics and interpersonal factors. Be sure to reference your readings to substantiate your responses. For Part 3 of this assignment you will need to plan and prepare for a brief interview with a volunteer subject matter expert. This hands-on practice will help you apply your learning in a real world context and provide you with insight into areas that you might need to improve on. source..
Content:
Evidence Presentation [Name] [Institution] [Date] Evidence Presentation Interview and interrogations are to some extend related, but they are fundamentally different processes. An interview can be defined as an information gathering exercise. It can also be referred to as a conversation between any two or more people, preferably face to face, with the aim of collecting relevant information. On the other hand, interrogation seeks to motivate the guilty to admit their participation in a crime or any other incident under investigation. These different objectives between interview and interrogation affect the behavior of the questioner, the scope of the setting, and the nature of the setting (Bunting, 2007). This paper explores the factors that lead to effective interviews/interrogation. It also includes plan for an interview. An interview is a non-suggestive process, because it only allows the interviewer to gather information and analyze it in order to determine whether the interviewee is telling the truth. An interviewer is not expected to alter the collected information in any way. He/she is expected to conduct the interview with unbiased professional attitude, with a tone that is objective and non-judgmental. On the other hand, an interrogator is expected to project to the suspected individual that he/she has no doubt that the suspect is guilty. He/she is expected to have extra confidence in convincing the suspect in order to break the resistance of the deceptive suspects. Factors/techniques that lead to an effective interview In order to extract relevant information from various individuals during an interview, it is imperative to adopt appropriate questioning techniques. By using appropriate questioning techniques, the interviewer will be in a position to make the exchange of information look natural while at the same time taking control of the conversation in a predetermined structure. Since the core objective in an interview is to stimulate and take control of the conversation, it is important to rely on the basic methods of creating conversation, which entails the use of questions (Seidman, 2006). If questions are used skillfully and subtly, the interviewer will be able to elicit information needed while at the same time allowing interviewees to feel comfortable in course of the interview. To ensure that the interview is conducted effectively, it is essential for the interviewer/interrogator to constantly obtain a better understanding of the human behavior. The interviewer should not stop seeking or studying the suspect for higher levels of insight. He/she must ensure that no obstacle prevents the interviewee from telling the truth. In addition, the interviewer must learn how to demonstrate to the interviewee the advantages of telling the truth, while at the same time diminishing the interviewee`s fear of punishment or any other consequences of telling the truth....
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

Other Topics:

Need a Plagiarism Free Essay?
Submit your instructions!