Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
2 pages/β‰ˆ550 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Literature & Language
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 7.2
Topic:

Class Actions, Usufructuary Rights, and The Federal Arbitration Act and Agreement

Essay Instructions:

Briefing Paper 1: Critical Legal Thinking
Instructions:
- Read AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion – Cheeseman text page 76
- Respond to the three Case Questions found in Cheeseman text page 77
- Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in the Critical legal Thinking, Ethics, and contemporary Business questions. Argue both sides of each issue.
Briefing Case 2: Law Case with Answers
Instructions:
- Read Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians – Cheeseman text page 16
- Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether the Treaty Rights of the Ojibwe Native Americans should still be in effect? Argue both sides of this issue.
Briefing Paper 3: Critical Legal Thinking Case
Instructions:
- Read Section 4.3 Physical Examination – Cheeseman text page 80
- Should Robert Schlagenhauf be subject to a Court Ordered medical examination against his will? Argue both sides.
Briefing Paper 4: Ethics Cases
Instructions:
- Read Section 4.6 Ethics – Cheeseman text page 81
- Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on the 3 questions found at the end of Section 4.6. Argue both sides of all issues.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Business law
Name
Course
Instructor
Date
Critical legal thinking- AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion and class action waivers
The class action waivers relate to clauses in a contract that prevent a party or both of them lodging class action lawsuit. Class actions occur when many people lodge a case in a court of law against another person. For employers, the arbitration clauses require the claimants to waive rights is practical, since the arbitration process is straight forward. However, the employees should not be compelled to sign the arbitration agreements. Employers should not withhold information regarding arbitration clauses, and when the employee is involved in the choice of the arbitrator then they are better placed to negotiate. Hence, the arbitration clauses are consistent with ethical practices so long as there is disclosure of information including remedies available, the costs of arbitration and the right to attorney representation (Nolo.com, n.d.). The class action waiver clauses in arbitration agreements are more beneficial to employers since this is a tool to limit the chances of class action lawsuits. The employers also find the arbitration process more straightforward and there is less risk that they would get punitive damages unlike juries which tend to sympathize with employees.
Law case with answers- Read Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians
The plaintiffs lodged a case to have the usufructuary rights to use the land where the Indians received as originally envisioned in an 1837 treaty. The Chippewa Indians ceded land, and they were guaranteed rights to the land, but this was revoked under an Executive Order in 1858. In a case pitting the Chippewa Indian Lile Lcas Band against the state of Minnesota and the U.S, the court held that the Indians reserved usufructuary rights to the land, and this was upheld by the upper court. The Treaty Rights of the Ojibwe Native Americans should stand to protect the right of the Native Americans who have struggled to hunt, and fish on the ceded territories and maintain their lifestyles (Ross, 2014).
Critical legal thinking case-...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!