Both David And Jennifer Define And Ultimately Redefine Their Gender

Nature vs Nurture
Name
Institution
Due Date
Nature vs Nurture
The debate titled nature vs nurture started a long time ago. The basis of this debate is whether certain aspects of mankind are either acquired or inherited. The term acquired means learned from experience or from upbringing. Inherited, on the other hand, means genetic or aspects that a person is born with. With regards to gender, the two groups, nature vs nurture, have been debating each claiming that gender identity is acquired while the other group claims it is inherited. There is a lot that can be said regarding gender and it is easy to get worked up in this discussion without an ounce of objectivity. In her article titled We Are All Works in Progress, Leslie Feinberg notes that “our lives are proof that sex and gender are much more complex than delivery room doctor’s glance at genitals can determine, more variegated than pink or blue birth caps.” Her statement was simply trying to ask people not to continue with the debate of nature vs nurture. To her, gender is a complex matter that cannot be wholly explained from either the perspective of the pro-nature or the pro-nurture enthusiasts. However, in the particular case of David Reimer, nature appears to have been stronger in influencing his final decision. Even though his parents raised him as a girl, David ended up switching back to being a boy and lived the rest of his life as a male member of society.
What does being a boy/girl/man/woman mean to David Reimer? Is this a result of nature or nurture?
From his story, one gathers that Brenda never accepted herself as a girl. Something was off for her and everything she did continued to denounce her parents’ decision to raise her as a girl. Being a girl did not mean much to her. Bratich et al. (2003) capture the sentiments of Brian (David’s brother) who said that he did think of Brenda as his sister. However, he continues to say that “She never, ever acted the part…When I say there was nothing feminine about Brenda, I mean there was nothing feminine. She walked like a guy. Sat with her legs apart. She talked about guy things, didn’t give a crap about cleaning the house, getting married, wearing makeup.” These words help to sum up David’s world at the time he was growing up. It never occurred to him that he was a girl. To David, being a boy made a lot more sense than being a girl and he was showing it in the way he acted and in the things he did even though his parents thought it best to raise him as a girl.
Theories of gender development cannot quite capture David’s situation. For example, the social learning theory purports that gender identity is acquired based on other people’s influence. Parents are often indicated as the main subjects of influence but with regards to David, nothing seemed to work. Brenda had not taken after the mother in any way. Like her brother Brian, Brenda had experienced the Oedipus complex and identified more with her father than her mother.
All of the above was a result of nature and not nurture. The environment does indeed shape how people grow up to become and the characteristics they develop. However, it would be imprudent to ignore the effects ...