Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/≈825 words
Sources:
4 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
History
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 10.8
Topic:

Rejection of President Bush on 1997 Kyoto Protocol on Global Warming

Essay Instructions:

“Presidents and Their ‘Doctrines,'” George W. Bush and the no child left behind act Then write a 3 page paper on the doctrine that president used Your research must include at least four (4) credible sources, apart from your textbook. Your paper must address the following:
Summarize a situation that required U.S. diplomatic efforts during the president's time in office.
Explicate the diplomatic doctrine the president followed, with reference to specific actions or events that occurred.
Describe the effects of these diplomatic efforts for the U.S. and other countries.
Assess, in conclusion, the advantages and disadvantages of the particular doctrine that was followed.
Cite at least four (4) reputable sources in addition to the textbook, not including Wikipedia, encyclopedias, or dictionaries.
Your assignment must:
Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Identify the cultural, economic, and political context of information resources, and interpret information in light of that context.
Use technology and information resources to research issues in international problems.
Write clearly and concisely about international problems using proper writing mechanics.

Essay Sample Content Preview:
Presidents and their Doctrines
Name:
Institution:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:
US Rejection of the Kyoto Protocol
The 1997 Kyoto protocol on global warming was rejected by President Bush when he came to power in 2001 despite the fact that the treaty had been signed by the Clinton administration. The only remaining thing after the signing of the deal in 1997 was ratified and the Bush administration walked away from the deal, claiming that the treaty would damage the US economy (Smh.com.au, 2002). The deal was supposed to be ratified during the UN global conference in India, but the US climate change negotiator Harlon Watson insisted that the US economy would suffer as a result of ratifying the deal. In addition to that, Watson argued that a depressed US economy would affect economic growth in developing countries because the US was their major export destination. The 1997 Kyoto agreement compelled wealthy and industrialized countries like the US to reduce the emission of up to six greenhouse gases by 2012 (Smh.com.au, 2002). The decision by President Bush to reject the Kyoto Protocol sparked widespread criticism from environmental activists and European countries that supported the treaty.
President Bush claimed that the US was committed to addressing the issue of global arming but at a sustainable level. According to president Bush, major emitters such as China and India did not have any set standards, but the mandates created from the US would cripple the US economy. According to Sanger (2001), there was a great uproar in Europe after Bush rejected the Kyoto protocol. The American delegation at the conference later admitted that they did a poor job in explaining to the delegates the reasons why the US was rejecting the treaty. The 'America First' unilateralism doctrine was revealed for the first by the rejection of the Kyoto treaty, but this doctrine would later be applied in the Iraq war and the war on terror after the 9/11 attacks.
The US Diplomatic efforts in the Kyoto Protocol
The rejection of the Kyoto protocol sparked a diplomatic row between the US and the European Union with the US, claiming that European countries were manipulating the discussion on climate change in order to harm the US. On the other hand, the European Union claimed that the US was only pursuing interests and was not interested in addressing the global warming issue. President Bush advocated for the gradual application of the new technology, but rejected any environmental limit that would hurt the US economy (Sanger, 2001). The US delegation at the India conference tried to convince the other participants to reject the treaty on the sidelines of the conference with very little success. The decision by president Bush received overwhelming support from Business groups in the US that claimed that fast-developing nations would gain an unfair economic advantage as a result of the deal. The Bush administra...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to global warming:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!