Response paper. Presidential Elections. History Essay

Presidential Elections
Student's Name
Institution Affiliation
Professor
Course
Date

Presidential Elections
A rough analysis of history helps unravel the truth about presidential campaigns, their influence in society, the elite's perceptions, and the intricate nature of the political landscape. Before picking a presidential candidate to run for elections, each party must vet the candidates and present the one that has the most likely chances to win. The process goes through the popular vote and the party votes, and here the lobbying is more intense because it may lead to the strengthening or weakening of a political party. In this historical analysis, we shall look through the political and social lives of former president George W. Bush, Abraham Lincoln, a presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and the current president Donald Trump.
Political and social lives are interconnected factors, and sometimes campaigns extend to their personal lives of candidates. The common perception is that candidates' personal lives should be left from the spotlight, but political discussions sometimes go beyond this point either compulsively or voluntarily. In the 2020 elections, there is the likelihood that previous events may be repeated even with the advent of technology because some campaign factors cannot be ignored. It is vital to note that for a presidential candidate to win an election, there must a visible track record of development. This way is the surest to convince the complete cast of voters that you are worth the consideration. A candidate may have adequate policies to help, but the disconnect with the voting block complicates such discussions. The campaign of Hillary Clinton is evidence of this message. To the run-up of the 2016 elections, it was clear that she had better strategies to...