Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
3 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

A Summary Of Relevant Documented Evidence: Sepsis

Essay Instructions:

I will provide the directions and references to be used in an attachment and below:
Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the projects problem and proposed solution. Make sure to do the following:
1. Include a description of the search method (e.g., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3. Incorporate a description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant, and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Topic 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
PICOT Question: In hospitalized patients (P), how does the use of an automatic electronic medical record-generated Sepsis screening tool (I) compared to traditional Sepsis assessment tool (C) increase the identification of septic patients and timely implementation of interventions (O) within 48 hours of admission (T)?
References:
Levy, M.M., Dellinger, R.P., Townsend, S.R. et al. Intensive Care Med (2010) 36: 222. https://doi(dot)org/10.1007/s00134-009-1738-3
Chiu YP, et al. (2011) Hospital perspective on nursing staff role and function in infection control NCBI. Retrieved from https://www(dot)ncbi(dot)nlm(dot)nih(dot)gov/m/pubmed/21809283/
Gyang, E., Shieh, L., Forsey, L., & Maggio, P. (2014). A nurse-driven screening tool for the early identification of sepsis in an intermediate care unit setting. Journal of hospital medicine, 10(2), 97-103.
Malloch, K., & Porter-O’Grady, T. (2016). Introduction to evidence-based practice in nursing and health care. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Sepsis
Name
Institution
Sepsis
Sepsis is the presence of toxic and harmful bacteria in people’s body tissues, especially through a wound infection. Traditionally, there was no better technology to test the bacteria in the tissue. Hence, people depended on physical observation of the severity of the problem to estimate the type of treatment to be used. Currently, most medical experts use screening tools to identify the problem and identify the specific treatment that fits the infection. Hence, the work will focus on search methods that will be used in the study, a summary of relevant documented evidence, and a description of the validity of both external and internal types of research.
The study design used will be a systematic review which will involve a summary of a collection of clinical literature. According to Zeng et al. (2015), a systematic review is a critical evaluation and assessment of every research study that addresses a given clinical problem. The researchers who apply the method use an organized method of evaluating, assembling, and locating a body of literature that relates to the particular topic under study. Typically, the study design includes a description of the results of the collection of various researches.
Moreover, the statistical data regarding the size of the people that are greatly affected by the bacteria and the location of those who are under risk will be obtained from national and international medical databases. The keywords that will be used during the study include infections, bacteria, medical doctors, prevailing rate, symptoms, and treatment. Ideally, there are no specific designed criteria for inclusion or exclusion of characteristics of study elements in the research. The study will involve anybody who has been infected by the virus and those who currently suffer from sepsis. The population under study will be randomly selected from the population without any discrimination, including those based on race or age.
Additionally, the opinions of those who know about the infection will be included in the study. Finally, there were more than 200 documented studies on the topic, but I only selected the best three from the list that I obtained. Therefore, the number of studies that fit the criteria are three which are research articles that I used after the selection.
The research is supported by various literature reviews that contain documentation of various works that relate to the topic. According to Gyang et al. (2015), a simple sepsis screening tool is an important way of identifying the first stages of the infection in both surgical and medical patients in an intermediate care facility setting. The study is supported by research that was done on 245 patients, which included 76 medical and 169 surgical. The study revealed that there was no material variation in tool performance among surgical and medical patients from the screen...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!