Research Critiques and PICOT Statement

RESEARCH CRITIQUES AND PICOT STATEMENT
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Date
INTRODUCTION
A research critique is a critical examination of a research project's successes and weaknesses. Critiquing is a method of reviewing scientific findings and the conclusions reached. Criticism is a method of critically evaluating a piece of study to demonstrate both its positives and limitations, as well as its relevance to practice. Professionals frequently need to select the best existing practice, and the opportunity to interpret and apply published research is crucial to this. Knowing the context in which the research was performed is significant because it clarifies the study's goal. (Asad 2017)
ARTICLE ONE: Quantitative Research: Ethics, Theory, and Research
The article's analysts concentrate on quantitative analysis. The writers further emphasize the importance of nursing scientific ethics and upholding the human interests of research participants in quantitative studies. The article investigates if registered nurses (RNs) with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) will contribute to the nursing study. Recognizing how to adapt the information learned by reading and interpreting literature to clinical practice is critical not just for the BSN-prepared RN but also for all nurses. When doing a research report, the value of ethics and written informed cannot be overstated. Following the revelation of past human rights abuses, a code of ethics for science was created to ensure that professional principles are followed. To safeguard researchers in research trials, ethical standards are developed by government legislation all over the world. Until beginning the process of explicit consent, the test approach explained the sample that will be tested to determine the study's potential positive and negative consequences.
Informed consent has three significant characteristics: disclosure of relevant facts necessary for the prospective subject to make an informed decision, and assisting in ensuring that the material provided to the potential study topic was known, as well as encouraging the notion that the theoretical research subject is voluntarily participating in the study. An experiment requiring informed consent will not be carried out until the correct consent was received; thus, Informed consent was obtained after the prospective test subject engaging in research. As a part of medical ethics, informed consent strikes a compromise between autonomy and beneficence, ensuring sufficient guarantee of voluntary and autonomous involvement without jeopardizing access to research benefits. (Nnebue 2010)
The distinction between qualitative and quantitative analysis is that qualitative research investigates and attributes significance to subjective life events. In contrast, quantitative research is used to prove correlations between factors numerically. When you use quantitative analysis, you're looking at the interaction between variables on purpose. The extent of the partnership being analyzed can vary determined by the research nature. If respondents do not take their diabetes drug as prescribed, a report on diabetic medication will not produce satisfactory results. Education and information are essential components of chronic ill...