Nurse Educator Competency 5: Pursue Systematic Self-Evaluation and Improvement

FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT I AM SENDING A BLANK COMPETENCY FORM 5 TO COMPLETE THE WORK.
I AM ALSO ATTACHING WEEK 1 COMPETENCY TO GIVE YOU THE IDEA OF HOW THIS ASSIGNMENT SHOULD BE COMPLETED. PLEASE BE SURE TO WRITE THE ANSWERS ON THE BLANK COMPETENCY FORM INCLUDED. FOR SMART GOALS, 2 IS SUFFICIENT. THE RUBRIC EXPECTATION IS ALSO INCLUDED. PLEASE NOTE THE PROFESSOR WANTS THE REFLECTION TO BE WRITTEN WITH VERY LITTLE INFORMATION, TWO PARAGRAPHS IS SUFFICIENT. ALSO PLEASE TOTAL HOW LONG IT TAKES FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT TO BE COMPLETED. ALSO PLEASE NOTE THE INSTRUCTOR WANTS THE ASSIGNMENT TO BE COMPLETED ON THE FORM PROVIDED. WHAT THE PROFESSOR WANTS FOR THE FORMATTING, SPACES IN BETWEEN NOT BE DOUBLE-SPACED. I APOLOGIZE FOR INCLUDING ALL OF THE EXTRA ADDITIONS. REASON IS DUE TO THE POINTS THAT HAVE BEEN TAKEN OFF FOR PREVIOUS COMPETENCIES COMPLETED FOR ME. THIS ASSIGNMENT IS ACTUALLY A RE-DO. MUCH GRATITUDE AND APPRECIATION FOR ACCEPTING TO COMPLETING THIS ASSIGNMENT.
Assessment Description
The "Nursing Education Practicum Documentation (NEPD) Forms" provide weekly, competency-based documentation of clinical practicum activities and are utilized by learners to communicate practicum experiences to course faculty. Be sure to read the instructions on the form for information on how to complete the assignment before you begin.
Using the "Nursing Education Practicum Documentation (NEPD) Form: Competency 5," write goals for what you will accomplish in this topic and how you will evaluate your accomplishments. The NEPD form uses the nursing process and follows the format of a nursing care plan, so this should be familiar to you.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Attachments
NUR-665E-RS-NEPD Form-Competency5-Topic 10.docx
Rubric Criteria
Learning Goals
1.6 points
Criteria Description
At least one learning goal for the assigned competency is written in the S.M.A.R.T. format.
5. Target
1.6 points
At least one learning goal for the assigned competency, written in the S.M.A.R.T. format, is thoroughly developed.
4. Acceptable
1.47 points
At least one learning goal for the assigned competency, written in the S.M.A.R.T. format, is well developed.
3. Approaching
1.41 points
At least one learning goal for the assigned competency, written in the S.M.A.R.T. format, is present.
2. Insufficient
1.28 points
At least one learning goal for the assigned competency, written in the S.M.A.R.T. format, is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Learning goals are not present.
Resources and Strategies
1.6 points
Criteria Description
Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are provided.
5. Target
1.6 points
Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are thoroughly developed.
4. Acceptable
1.47 points
Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are well-developed.
3. Approaching
1.41 points
Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are present.
2. Insufficient
1.28 points
Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals lack details or are incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Resources and strategies to accomplish the learning goals are not present.
Measurement
1.6 points
Criteria Description
How the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used are described.
5. Target
1.6 points
A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used is well-developed.
4. Acceptable
1.47 points
A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used is thoroughly developed.
3. Approaching
1.41 points
A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used is present.
2. Insufficient
1.28 points
A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of how the accomplishment of learning goals will be measured and what criteria will be used is not present.
Evaluation
1.6 points
Criteria Description
The accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is described.
5. Target
1.6 points
A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is well-developed.
4. Acceptable
1.47 points
A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is thoroughly developed.
3. Approaching
1.41 points
A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is present.
2. Insufficient
1.28 points
A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the accomplishment that serves as evidence for meeting the learning goals is not present
Competency Reflection
1.6 points
Criteria Description
Competency analysis of practicum experience and the connection between the competency and practicum experience is provided.
5. Target
1.6 points
Competency analysis of practicum experience and a connection between the competency and practicum experience is thoroughly developed.
4. Acceptable
1.47 points
Competency analysis of practicum experience and a connection between the competency and practicum experience is well-developed.
3. Approaching
1.41 points
Competency analysis of practicum experience and a connection between the competency and practicum experience is present.
2. Insufficient
1.28 points
Competency analysis of practicum experience and a connection between the competency and practicum experience is lacks detail or is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Competency analysis of practicum experience and the connection between the competency and practicum experience is not present.
Clinical Hours
1 points
Criteria Description
Clinical hours completed for the topic and total-to-date are documented.
5. Target
1 points
The clinical hours completed for the topic and total-to-date are present.
4. Acceptable
0.92 points
N/A
3. Approaching
0.88 points
N/A
2. Insufficient
0.8 points
N/A
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The clinical hours completed for the topic and total-to-date are not present.
Mechanics of Writing
0.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.
5. Target
0.5 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
4. Acceptable
0.46 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
3. Approaching
0.44 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.
2. Insufficient
0.4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

Format/Documentation
0.5 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target
0.5 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable
0.46 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching
0.44 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.
2. Insufficient
0.4 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.