Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Essay Available:
Pages:
3 pages/β‰ˆ825 words
Sources:
2 Sources
Style:
APA
Subject:
Health, Medicine, Nursing
Type:
Essay
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 12.96
Topic:

Nurse-to-Nurse Incivility/Horizontal Violence in Nursing

Essay Instructions:

Annalyzing Published Research
Annalyzing Published Research
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Problem
30.0 to >27.0 pts
Includes all elements in a manner that is clearly understood. • Problem description provides focus of the group’s work. • Significance of the problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence. • Purpose of paper is clearly stated.
27.0 to >25.0 pts
Missing only one element OR One element is not presented clearly • Problem description provides focus of the group’s work. • Significance of the problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence. • Purpose of paper is clearly stated.
25.0 to >22.0 pts
Missing two elements OR One element is not presented clearly • Problem description provides focus of the group’s work. • Significance of the problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence. • Purpose of paper is clearly stated.
22.0 to >0 pts
Missing two or more elements AND/OR One or more elements are not presented clearly • Problem description provides focus of the group’s work. • Significance of the problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence. • Purpose of paper is clearly stated.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of Findings: Summary
60.0 to >55.0 pts
Summary omits no more than one required item from the Evidence Matrix Table.
55.0 to >50.0 pts
Summary omits two or three required items from the Evidence Matrix Table.
50.0 to >45.0 pts
Summary omits four required items from the Evidence Matrix Table.
45.0 to >0 pts
Summary omits five or more required items from the Evidence Matrix Table.
60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of Findings: Description
60.0 to >55.0 pts
Description includes ALL elements. • What concepts have been studied? • What methods have been used? • Who are the participants or members of the samples? • What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the reliability and validity? • How do you answer your original “the purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your question? • What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
55.0 to >50.0 pts
Description missing no more than one element. • What concepts have been studied? • What methods have been used? • Who are the participants or members of the samples? • What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the reliability and validity? • How do you answer your original “the purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your question? • What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
50.0 to >45.0 pts
Description missing no more than two elements. • What concepts have been studied? • What methods have been used? • Who are the participants or members of the samples? • What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the reliability and validity? • How do you answer your original “the purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your question? • What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
45.0 to >0 pts
Description missing three or more elements. • What concepts have been studied? • What methods have been used? • Who are the participants or members of the samples? • What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the reliability and validity? • How do you answer your original “the purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your question? • What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
60.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of Findings: Conclusion
20.0 to >17.0 pts
Summary paragraph includes ALL major findings from article. • Independently extracts complex data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences consistent with the data, and relates them to a larger context. • Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in formulating interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a given situation. • Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences drawn from data.
17.0 to >15.0 pts
Summary paragraph omits ONE major finding from article. • Independently extracts complex data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences consistent with the data, and relates them to a larger context. • Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in formulating interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a given situation. • Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences drawn from data.
15.0 to >12.0 pts
Summary paragraph omits TWO major findings from article. • Independently extracts complex data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences consistent with the data, and relates them to a larger context. • Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in formulating interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a given situation. • Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences drawn from data.
12.0 to >0 pts
Summary paragraph omits THREE or MORE major findings from article. • Independently extracts complex data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences consistent with the data, and relates them to a larger context. • Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in formulating interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a given situation. • Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics, and APA Format
30.0 to >27.0 pts
• Length is three full pages. • Used appropriate APA format and is free of errors. • Includes ALL headings and subheadings as instructed. • Grammar, spelling, and mechanics are free of errors.
27.0 to >25.0 pts
• Length is no more than one quarter page under or over. • Used appropriate APA format, with one type of error. • Includes ALL headings and subheadings as instructed. • Grammar, spelling, and mechanics have one type of error.
25.0 to >22.0 pts
• Length is no more than one half page under or over. • Used appropriate APA format, with two types of errors. • Includes ALL headings and subheadings as instructed. • Grammar, spelling, and mechanics have two types of errors.
22.0 to >0 pts
• Length is three quarters of a page or more under or over. • Attempts made to use APA format; three or more types of errors are present. • Includes ALL headings and subheadings as instructed. • Grammar, spelling, and mechanics have three or more types of errors.
30.0 pts
Total Points: 200.0

Essay Sample Content Preview:

Incivility in Nursing
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course Name/Number
Instructor’s Name
Due Date
Clinical Question
The clinical question guiding the search for the qualitative study is: What is the influence of workplace incivility on outcomes and what can be done to alleviate workplace incivility
The clinical question guiding the search for the quantitative study is: Are there differences in the experience of incivility in different generations of nursing?
Problem
In this paper, the problem addressed is how acts of incivility affect members of the nursing profession and how acts of incivility impact patient outcomes. The significance of this problem is that uncivil work environments cause hospitals to experience the additional consequences through added costs related to nursing turnover, absenteeism, and decreased work performance. As evidenced in one report, for every percentage increase in turnover rates, the average hospital will spend an estimated $379, 500 (Solutions, 2015). Even though the effects on nurses and hospitals are detrimental, a more detrimental effect of incivility comes from its threat to patient safety and patient outcomes.
Description of Findings
Concepts
The independent variable in the qualitative and quantitative studies is nursing incivility. The quantitative study investigates the different experiences of incivility in two generations of associate degree nursing facility. The variable of interest examined in the qualitative study is how nursing incivility impacts outcomes. The concept of the qualitative study was how workplace incivility could be prevented from the nurses’ perspectives.
Methods
The method used in the qualitative study was unstructured interviews. In-depth interviews were conducted, lasting from thirty-five to sixty-five minutes. Six interviews were conducted at the researcher’s workplace, and thirty interviews were conducted at the hospital. All interviews were audiotape recorded and participants’ behaviors were monitored in the hospital during nursing care and other activities (Abdollahzadeh et al., 2017). The method used in the quantitative study was descriptive methodology, with non-experimental, cross-sectional survey designs. The author’s educational institution approved the institutional board. Licensing and authorization to use the INE (Incivility in Nursing Education) were obtained from the study’s author after the completion of the study (Ziefle, 2018).
Participants
Participants in the qualitative study were purposively chosen from nurses working in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, based on saturation principles. The criterion for inclusion was bachelor’s degree in nursing and a year of nursing experience, at least. Thirty-four participants participated in the study (Abdollahzadeh et al., 2017). Participants in th...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:
Order

πŸ‘€ Other Visitors are Viewing These APA Essay Samples: