Business leadership essay. Moral analyst of business related case.

Business leadership essay. Moral analyst of business related case.

Assignment 4: Final Case Brief
1
Learning Objective
The purpose of the Final Case Brief is to develop and justify an action plan to manage an ethicalchallenge.
Overview
In writing your Final Case Brief, you should select an ethical problem either from current business newsor from your own observation or experience. Remember that you are conducting an ethical analysis todevelop an action plan, so your brief will be evaluated for your framing of the problem, the argumentsyou make, and the evidence and expertise you apply to support your arguments. Your choice of aproblem, its complexity, and its relevance for contemporary business will be considered in your gradefor this assignment. It is in your interest to choose a unique, complex, and relevant problem that hasnot been widely discussed or evaluated to demonstrate your values, intelligence, and skill.You will conduct your own ethical analysis of a scenario and develop an action plan using the tools,methods, and frameworks from the course as well as your own independent inquiry and thought. Youmay consult any and all learning materials from the seminar and elsewhere; you may also consult anddiscuss the case with others. The written brief, however, must be entirely your own work. If you doconsult other sources, you must credit and cite them properly in APA format.
Execution Steps
You are advised to begin thinking about the Final Case Brief early on so that you are ready toconcentrate on it as soon as your Moral Compass Essay is completed. Be sure to follow each step of theoutline below and address each relevant question.
Title of the Case: (How will you identify this case?)
Source: (What is the source of your information about this case?)
Case Overview “Big picture” interpretation of the case in one or two sentences. How would youcharacterize the moral challenge of this case? Why is this case morallyimportant?
Key Facts Your factual discovery of key events, actors, and evidence: What relevant events,people, and evidence are key to understanding the situation or problem? Whatcontextual/ technical knowledge needs to be considered? What are yoursources for the facts of the case and how reliable are they?
Ethical Analysis Your interpretation of the values conflict or moral challenge.• What is the main moral issue in this case? What is at stake? What is themoral urgency? (Uncertainty, risk, danger)
The Final Case Brief is a formal report (under 2,000 words) that frames, evaluates, and develops anac<on plan for managing an ethical challenge that you have iden<fied. This is your opportunity todemonstrate everything you know about applying human values to the challenges of businessleadership.
2
• Who is the key moral actor in this case? Whose actions and decisionsdetermine the moral resolution of this case?
• What is your intuitive moral judgment of the issue? What foundational moralvalues are involved? (CARE, LIBERTY, FAIRNESS, LOYALTY, AUTHORITY,SANCTITY)
• How do values and moral judgments conflict? Is it a right/right or right/wrongconflict? What type of right/right?
• Is the moral issue with an action, the means of action, or the intent of anaction?
• What normative moral claims and standpoints of VIRTUE (character,common good), DUTY (principle, moral claims), and CONSEQUENCES(outcomes, harm, cost, benefit) should you consider in evaluating the moralchallenge?
• How would you apply the values and code of your wisdom tradition tounderstand and explain the moral issue?
• How does the moral challenge align/conflict with the core values of yourWisdom Tradition and that of stakeholders?
StakeholderAnalysisYour interpretation of stakeholder interests in light of precedents, context, andevidence: Who are the stakeholders (individuals, groups, or entities) whose values, moralclaims, and duties constitute the moral challenge of the case? What values,Wisdom Traditions, and moral arguments support their claims? How valid andsound are those claims? What competing or contested values, claims, or duties complicate this case?Which stakeholders have more urgent and compelling claims? Why? What similar cases or situations are useful as analogues for evaluating thiscase? Your interpretation of options. What are the feasible options for the key moralactor to consider in resolving the moral problem? On what grounds are theymorally justified?Decision Your action recommendation. Which option is the most ethical, and on whatgrounds? How does the action express/reflect your core values?SummaryArgumentYour argument in brief: Explain the best decision option or action planpersuasively in fewer than 25 words.Options AnalysisFINAL CASE BRIEF RUBRIC (Revised August 2018) Exemplary (A)* Proficient (B)* Developing (C)* Unsatisfactory (F)Case Overview,Key Facts(20%)• Identifies a highly complex, multifaceted ethical challenge.• Describes relevant events, people,facts, and technical knowledge.• Analyzes the assumptions ofsources.• Evaluates relevance of contexts.• Identifies a complex ethicalchallenge.• Describes relevant events,people, facts, and technicalknowledge.• Addresses the assumptions ofsources.• Identifies a conventional,uncomplicated ethical challenge.• Describes relevant events, people,facts, and technical knowledge.• Relies on questionable sources or doesnot address the assumptions ofsources.Key facts are missing orgrossly insufficient incontent.Ethical Analysis,StakeholderAnalysis(35%)• Synthesizes personal experience,empirical observation,independent inquiry, wisdomtraditions, and other expertsources to analyze this case.• Thoroughly critiques personalvalues and social norms frommultiple perspectives.• Integrates alternate, divergent, orcontradictory perspectives orideas fully.• Draws thoughtfully frompersonal/socialvalues/experience, relevantknowledge, empiricalevidence, wisdom traditions,and reputable sources toanalyze this case.• Critically scrutinizes personalvalues and social norms.• Incorporates alternate,divergent, or contradictoryperspectives or ideas in anexploratory way.• Ignores or draws superficially frompersonal values, experience,observation, and/or mainstreammedia sources.• Does not question personal values orsocial norms.• Acknowledges (mentions in passing)alternate, divergent, or contradictoryperspectives or ideas.Elements are missing.OptionAnalysis,Decision,SummaryArgument(30%)Does all of the following:• Considers culture and context ofproblem;• examines feasibility of solution;• weighs impacts of solution tovarious stakeholders;• addresses the ethical implicationsof the solution;• discusses the limitations of thesolution.Does most of the following:• Considers culture and contextof problem;• examines feasibility ofsolution;• weighs impacts of solution tovarious stakeholders;• addresses the ethicalimplications of the solution;• discusses the limitations of thesolution.Solutions are “off the shelf” rather thanindividually designed to address thespecific contextual factors of the problem,or are vague or only indirectly address theproblem.Element are missing.Guidelines(15%)Meets all assignment requirements(length, format, structure, APA formatfor citations).Writes a highly originaland flawless brief. Uses language thatskillfully communicates meaning withclarity and fluency.Meets all assignment requirements(length, format, structure, APAformat for citations).Does not meet all assignmentrequirements (length, format, structure,APA format for citations), or writing hasmany errors, or does not cite sources.Paper violates the CareySchool Honor Code(plagiarism or other violationof academic integrity).* Note: At instructor’s discretion, a plus (+) or minus (-) maybe given to designate a letter grade that overlaps with the adjoining criteria.