Visual Analysis Of Zeus Seated On An Eagle: Part 2

The part 1 is done, do part2.
Part 2 need to base on the part1, but need follow the feedback for part 1.
Should be same artifact
Please read the part 1 and the feedback of part1

FAH205 Art in Antiquity ROM VISUAL ANALYSIS ASSIGNMENT (30% of overall mark) Students must choose an artifact from the collection of Greco-Roman antiquities at the Royal Ontario Museum for analysis. Students can view some of these artifacts via: ROM Images website, http://images.rom.on.ca : search via subject, collection area, or image category. Students must view and photograph their artifact at the ROM. Admission to the ROM is free on Tuesday afternoons for post-secondary students with current student card. This assignment consists of two parts, both parts must be completed to gain full marks: PART I: OUTLINE + ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY (10%) Students must submit a 2-page typed document that includes: a 1-page outline (with a clear thesis statement) and a 1-page preliminary annotated bibliography of 3 scholarly, secondary sources, fully and properly referenced. Step 1: The Outline. The outline must demonstrate that you have begun to plan your report; it should outline the structure and argument of your report. • The outline can be written in full sentences or bullet points, with headings and subheadings, according to the following format: introduction (what is your thesis?), body paragraphs, and conclusion. • The outline should start to reveal the answers to the 5Ws (see VISUAL ANALYSIS, below, p. 4), • You can ask questions or raise concerns in your outline. Step 2: The Annotated Bibliography. The annotated bibliography must demonstrate that you have begun to research your artifact; in addition to bibliographic data, an annotated bibliography provides a concise summary of each source and some assessment of its value or relevance. • Each annotation must briefly state the main argument of a source. An annotation of an academic source, for example, typically identifies its thesis (or research question, or hypothesis), its major methods of investigation, and its main conclusions. Keep in mind that identifying the argument of a source is different from describing or listing its contents. • Each annotation should also briefly assess the value of the source to an investigation of your research question or topic. Keep in mind models for assessing arguments in the discipline of art history. Remember…. Ø You can view the FAH205 Library Research Guide for help finding / citing sources. Ø This document must be well written and free of spelling and/or grammatical errors. Ø Include your full name, student ID#, your instructor’s and TA’s name, the course code, and the date of submission. This is due on Wednesday, February 19th, 2020 via Quercus. No late submissions will be accepted. FAH205 Art in Antiquity 2 PART II: REPORT (20%) Following the completion (and review of feedback) of PART I, students will perform a close visual analysis of their artifact (see VISUAL ANALYSIS, below, p. 4),) and explore its (political, historical, religious, etc.) context within a well-structured and well-written, c. 2,000 word report. The report must answer all of the 5Ws. Answering the 5Ws is key to understanding the context of the artifact and will determine your argument: why was this artifact made, by whom, and for whom? What does it tell us, specifically, about Greek or Roman art and life? Report Requirements: ● Title Page – Include a creative and relevant title page with the title of your assignment, your full name, ID#, your instructor’s and TA’s name, the course code, and the date of submission. ● Text – Your assignment must be well written and well structured. Please be sure to proofread your assignment before submission. It is expected that students enrolled in university courses have mastered basic writing skills. All papers must exhibit proper spelling (including proper names, places, and words in foreign languages), grammar, and punctuation. ● Formatting – assignments must be typed in Arial or Times New Roman font, size 12, 1.5 line spacing. Assignments will be penalized (5%) if significantly below/above (c. +/- 200 words) the c. 2,000 word requirement. Please attach a print screen of the word count at the end of the assignment. Please also include page numbers. ● Ancient Sources: Textual – when using ancient literary sources, these must be fully cited according to the Oxford Classical Dictionary, which can be found in the UTM Library or online at www.classics.oxfordre.com ● Ancient Sources: Visual – please include images of your artifact (as an Appendix) from a variety of angles and perspectives. Be sure to provide all relevant information: artist, year, provenance, current museum location, and accession number. Please also cite the source from which you obtained the images. ● Modern Sources – you must have at least 3 scholarly, secondary sources. Be sure to properly reference your sources, in the footnotes and bibliography, using Chicago MoS formatting. ● Appendix – if choose to include images in an Appendix, this should immediately precede the Bibliography. Please number (e.g. Fig. 1) and label (e.g. Augustus of Prima Porta, front view) each image. ● Bibliography – include as the last page of your assignment. Please use Chicago MoS formatting. Remember… Ø You can view the FAH205 Library Research Guide for help finding / citing sources. Ø You can review the GRADING CRITERIA below (p. 5) for more information. Ø You can contact the TA and/or the instructor if you have questions or concerns. Don’t wait until the last minute; the earlier, the better! This is due by Wednesday, March 25th, 2020 via Turnitin and Quercus. Late assignments will be penalized 5% per day, up to 1 week. Reports submitted thereafter will not be graded and will receive a mark of zero. FAH205 Art in Antiquity 3 Report Strategy: The best advice I can give you is: START EARLY! You should plan your report carefully, choosing an artifact and identifying what you see as the key issues and discussing them systematically, with constant reference to, and critical analysis of both primary and secondary evidence. The University of Toronto Mississauga has excellent resources that you can (and should!) take advantage of for your assignment. Please consult the following: The Library The University of Toronto has one of the best research library systems in North America, and all of the resources it offers are available to you. Even if a book is not located at the UTM library, you can request that the item be brought here from any other library. For further information, please visit the library website at: www.utm.utoronto.ca/library Academic Skills Centre If you need assistance improving your writing skills contact the Academic Skills Centre (http://www.utm.utoronto.ca/asc/) located on the 3rd floor of Hazel McCallion Academic Learning Centre. Academic Integrity Students are expected to uphold the university’s high standards of academic integrity, whi ch can be found at http://www.utoronto.ca/academicintegrity/resourcesforstudents.html. It is the student’s responsibility to understand and abide by the University’s Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters, available here: http://www.governingcouncil.utoronto.ca/policiies/behaveac.htm . Please also note that the University has a strict policy against Plagiarism: Plagiarism is a serious academic offence! The rules concerning plagiarism are covered in the UTM Calendar as are the rules for Academic Honesty (see www.utm.utoronto.ca/regcal/) and the Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters (http://www.utm.utoronto.ca/regcal/WEBGEN117.html). Read them thoroughly! In addition, see http://www.utoronto.ca/writing/plagsep.html for tips on “How Not To Plagiarise”. It is your responsibility to know and understand the rules regarding plagiarism. Potential plagiarism offences include, but are not limited to: • Copying material word-for-word from a source and not placing the words within quotation marks • Lengthy and close paraphrasing of another person’s work (i.e. extensive 
copying interspersed with a few phrases or sentences of your own) • Submitting written work produced by someone else as if it were your own 
work (e.g. another student’s term paper, a paper purchased or downloaded from the internet) • Handing in your own work in more than one course without the permission of the instructor • Making up sources or facts (lack of references) FAH205 Art in Antiquity 4 VISUAL ANALYSIS: What is Visual Analysis? Like any literary work, every monument, every image and every artwork has a story to tell; the problem, however, is that people cannot often find the right words when it comes to a visual artifact. So how does one extract meaning from a visual artifact? Most art historians today hold that a visual artifact has multiple meanings: the meaning(s) it had for the artist/creator, the meaning(s) it had for its first audience, the meaning(s) it had for later audiences, and the meaning(s) it has for us today. Whether you are a veteran art historian or a novice art enthusiast, everyone has the ability to read a visual artifact – this is known as visual analysis. The key to any visual analysis begins with asking the right questions, and that means focusing on the 5 Ws: Who? (Who crafted/painted/sculpted or constructed the artifact? Were there multiple artists? For whom was it made? Whom does the image/object represent?) What? (What does the image/object represent? What is happening in the scene depicted? If you are unsure of the exact subject matter, can you discern a general theme? This is where DESCRIPTION is very important – describe what you see, in detail!) Where? (Where was the work found? Is this the same place as where it was originally displayed? Can you hypothesize where it might have been displayed based on subject matter or theme? Where is it currently displayed? How does its modern context affect its ancient context?) When? (When was it created? When was it found? by what means? Can you uncover anything about its history from antiquity to the present day?) Why? (Why was it created? What was its function? Why is it important to us today?) Your Task Your task is to write your report by employing visual analysis of an artifact from the GrecoRoman galleries at the Royal Ontario Museum. You will first want to ask as many of the questions above as possible. The answers to some of these questions will be readily available from secondary sources, but the point of this assignment is not to simply regurgitate this information through direct quotes, but rather, to get you to start looking at visual artifacts and analyzing what you see by asking various questions. With these questions you will be able to gain insight into what these artifacts tell us about the function and context of art in antiquity. FAH205 Art in Antiquity 5 GRADING CRITERIA: The following official grading scheme and definitions of grades are stated in the UTM Academic Calendar 2019-2020: Percentage Grade Grade Definition 90-100 A+ Excellent: Strong evidence of original thinking; good organization, capacity to analyze and synthesize; superior grasp of subject matter with sound critical evaluations; evidence of extensive knowledge base. 85-89 A 80-84 A77-79 B+ Good: Evidence of grasp of subject matter; some evidence of critical capacity and analytic ability; reasonable understanding of relevant issues; evidence of familiarity with the literature. 73-76 B 70-72 B67-69 C+ Adequate: Student who is profiting from her/his university experience; understanding of the subject matter; ability to develop solutions to simple problems in the material. 63-66 C 60-62 C57-59 D+ Marginal: Some evidence of familiarity with subject matter and some evidence that critical and analytic skills have been developed. 53-56 D 50-52 D0-49 F Inadequate: Little evidence of even superficial understanding of the subject matter; weakness in critical and analytic skills; with limited or irrelevant use of literature. Marks are assigned according to the above criteria, based on a holistic assessment of analysis and arguments, structure, and writing. Marks will be deducted for: • missing reproduction(s) of the image(s) you analyze (minus 5%) • improper citations and/or omitting sources in the Bibliography (minus 5%) • unacceptably poor spelling, grammar and English (minus 5%) • failing to reach the minimum or exceeding the maximum page length by +/- 250 words (minus 5%) Cases of plagiarism are taken very seriously. Penalties for plagiarism range from a grade of 0 for the assignment or the course to suspension and even expulsion from the University. All suspected cases of academic dishonesty will be investigated following the procedures outlined in the University’s Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters. Students are encouraged to attend the ELL Tutorials for assistance with course readings and course work, including the Visual Analysis Assignment.