Sign In
Not register? Register Now!
Pages:
1 page/≈275 words
Sources:
Check Instructions
Style:
Other
Subject:
History
Type:
Coursework
Language:
English (U.S.)
Document:
MS Word
Date:
Total cost:
$ 4.32
Topic:

The Battle Over Freedom of the Press

Coursework Instructions:

The Battle Over Freedom of the Press
Even now as our nation attempts to deal with the continuing controversies involving the various media platforms of our society’s mass communication in the digital age, we find ourselves embroiled in a battle over freedom of the press. The right to “free speech” is enshrined in the 1st Amendment of our U.S. Constitution. Freedom of speech may be exercised in direct (words) or a symbolic (actions) way. Freedom of speech is recognized as a human right under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without government interference or regulation. Despite the popular misunderstanding, the right to freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment is not very different from the right to freedom of speech. It allows an individual to express themselves through publication and dissemination. It is part of the constitutional protection of freedom of expression. It does not afford members of the media any special rights or privileges not afforded to citizens in general.
Keeping these thoughts in mind, please offer your thoughts on the question of “freedom of the press” that is posed after reading an editorial article that I recently read on this topic ….
https://pagosadailypost(dot)com/2021/01/15/editorial-the-inconvenient-truth-about-freedom-of-the-press/ (Links to an external site.)
In this article, the author makes a few key points …
“The press” has an incredible amount of freedom in this country.
There is nothing in the U.S. Constitution, however, that grants all individuals equal access to privately-owned media outlets.
A free press is under no legal obligation to publish comments — by the President or anyone else — that they consider to be false or misleading.
Question:
Are the major social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, etc.), as information providers of a free press violating the 1st Amendment rights of any U.S. citizen when they refuse to allow that citizen to post information on their platforms which the corporation deems unacceptable to their company’s mission and operations ? …. (In your response, regardless of your viewpoint, be sure to add “why” this battle over freedom of the press is important to our democracy.)

Coursework Sample Content Preview:

The Battle Over Freedom of The Press
Student Name
Institutional Affiliation
The Battle Over Freedom of The Press
The major social media sites, including Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram, do not violate the First Amendment rights of Americans by denying them the discretion to post on their pages’ information that such corporations deem unacceptable for various rationales. First, these are privately-owned media outlets, and the First Amendment does not grant Americans equal access to such entities’ information or resources. The company should reserve a right to control the type of content shared and what needs to be rejected. Second, the First Amendment prevents the United States Congress from abridging Americans’ right to speech and the freedom of the press [including electronic media, radio, and television] (Hudson, 2021). In this vein, the social media platforms are categorized as electronic media, thus securing their free press rights. Private sector actors can curtail sharing of unacceptable content that could harm the corporation’s op...
Updated on
Get the Whole Paper!
Not exactly what you need?
Do you need a custom essay? Order right now:

You Might Also Like Other Topics Related to freedom of speech:

HIRE A WRITER FROM $11.95 / PAGE
ORDER WITH 15% DISCOUNT!